Multimodal Neuroimaging in the Prediction of Deep TMS Response in OCD

<b>Backgrounds:</b> Brain morphological biomarkers could contribute to understanding the treatment response in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Multimodal neuroimaging addresses this issue by providing more comprehensive information regarding neural processes and structures. <b>Objectives.</b> The present study aims to investigate whether patients responsive to deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) differ from non-responsive individuals in terms of electrophysiology and brain morphology. Secondly, to test whether multimodal neuroimaging is superior to unimodal neuroimaging in predicting response to deep TMS. <b>Methods.</b> Thirty-two OCD patients who underwent thirty sessions of deep TMS treatment were included in the study. Based on a minimum 50% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores after treatment, patients were grouped as responders (n = 25) and non-responders (n = 7). The baseline resting state qEEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) records of patients were recorded. Independent sample t-test is used to compare the groups. Then, three logistic regression model were calculated for only QEEG markers, only MRI markers, and both QEEG/MRI markers. The predictive values of the three models were compared. <b>Results.</b> OCD patients who responded to deep TMS treatment had increased Alpha-2 power in the left temporal area and increased volume in the left temporal pole, entorhinal area, and parahippocampal gyrus compared to non-responders. The logistic regression model showed better prediction performance when both QEEG and MRI markers were included. <b>Conclusions.</b> This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding new functional and structural neuroimaging markers and highlights the superiority of multimodal neuroimaging to unimodal neuroimaging techniques in predicting treatment response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241298977
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Neuroimaging in the Prediction of Deep TMS Response in OCD

Mehmet Güven Günver, Murat Aşık, Mehmet Kemal Arıkan, Özden Orhan et al.
1 citations
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
0.64
article

Multimodal Neuroimaging in the Prediction of Deep TMS Response in OCD

Mehmet Güven Günver, Murat Aşık, Mehmet Kemal Arıkan, Özden Orhan, Muhammed Taha Esmeray, Reyhan İlhan, Öznur Kalaba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Backgrounds:</b> Brain morphological biomarkers could contribute to understanding the treatment response in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Multimodal neuroimaging addresses this issue by providing more comprehensive information regarding neural processes and structures. <b>Objectives.</b> The present study aims to investigate whether patients responsive to deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) differ from non-responsive individuals in terms of electrophysiology and brain morphology. Secondly, to test whether multimodal neuroimaging is superior to unimodal neuroimaging in predicting response to deep TMS. <b>Methods.</b> Thirty-two OCD patients who underwent thirty sessions of deep TMS treatment were included in the study. Based on a minimum 50% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores after treatment, patients were grouped as responders (n = 25) and non-responders (n = 7). The baseline resting state qEEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) records of patients were recorded. Independent sample t-test is used to compare the groups. Then, three logistic regression model were calculated for only QEEG markers, only MRI markers, and both QEEG/MRI markers. The predictive values of the three models were compared. <b>Results.</b> OCD patients who responded to deep TMS treatment had increased Alpha-2 power in the left temporal area and increased volume in the left temporal pole, entorhinal area, and parahippocampal gyrus compared to non-responders. The logistic regression model showed better prediction performance when both QEEG and MRI markers were included. <b>Conclusions.</b> This study addresses the gap in the literature regarding new functional and structural neuroimaging markers and highlights the superiority of multimodal neuroimaging to unimodal neuroimaging techniques in predicting treatment response.

Clinical EEG and NeuroscienceVol. 56(3)
Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.