The accuracy of digital scanners versus conventional impression in patients with cleft lip and palate: A cross-sectional study

This study concluded that digital scanners have accuracy comparable to conventional methods, except for depth-related soft tissue parameters, which exhibited a high level of discrepancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Saudi Dental Journal
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.11.005
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The accuracy of digital scanners versus conventional impression in patients with cleft lip and palate: A cross-sectional study

Amornrut Manosudprasit, Natthasit Pudpong, Subin Puasiri
The Saudi Dental Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

The accuracy of digital scanners versus conventional impression in patients with cleft lip and palate: A cross-sectional study

Amornrut Manosudprasit, Natthasit Pudpong, Subin Puasiri
article en

Abstract

This study concluded that digital scanners have accuracy comparable to conventional methods, except for depth-related soft tissue parameters, which exhibited a high level of discrepancy.

The Saudi Dental JournalVol. 36(12)
Khon Kaen University (TH)
Khon Kaen University, National Science and Technology Development Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.