Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SAS-J) with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

Abstract Background One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass is one of the commonest bariatric surgeries worldwide, which has been demonstrated to produce excellent bariatric and metabolic outcomes. Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass is a novel procedure that was developed in Hazrat e Rasool Hospital by Pazouki and Kermansavari in 2019 to form an anastomosis between the sleeved stomach and the jejunum rather than the ileum as a modification of the previously known SASI. Objective To compare the outcome of SASJ with OAGB as regards efficacy and safety in a 6- month postoperative follow up period. Patients and Methods This was a comparative prospective randomized study conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals, over 40 patients devided into 2 groups. First group was composed of 20 patients who underwent SASJ operation, and second group was composed of 20 patients who underwent OAGB operation. Results The mean excess weight loss percentage after 6 months of SASJ group of patients was 51.55% ± 15.11, and 58.30% ± 24.32 in OAGB group. Both groups showed excellent outcomes as regards comorbidities resolution. In OAGB group, there was 1 patient who had postoperative bleeding. In SASJ group, we had one case of reflux alkaline gastritis that needed readmission. In addition, we had one case (5%) that needed reoperation and conversion to Roux-en Y configuration. In SASJ group, there were 7 patients complained from bile reflux, and 3 patients in OAGB group. In SASJ group of patients we had only 1 patient who developed postoperative gall bladder stones, and 6 patients in OAGB group. Conclusion Both OAGB and SASJ are effective bariatric procedures as regards weight loss and comorbidities resolution such as DM, HTN and hyperlipidemia. Incidence of biliary reflux was found more among the SASJ patients, but it was almost overcomed after performing the antireflux suture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.286
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SAS-J) with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

A S Zaher, M Elbanna, Ibrahim Mohamed, Karim Sabry Abd-ElSamea
QJM
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SAS-J) with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

A S Zaher, M Elbanna, Ibrahim Mohamed, Karim Sabry Abd-ElSamea
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass is one of the commonest bariatric surgeries worldwide, which has been demonstrated to produce excellent bariatric and metabolic outcomes. Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass is a novel procedure that was developed in Hazrat e Rasool Hospital by Pazouki and Kermansavari in 2019 to form an anastomosis between the sleeved stomach and the jejunum rather than the ileum as a modification of the previously known SASI. Objective To compare the outcome of SASJ with OAGB as regards efficacy and safety in a 6- month postoperative follow up period. Patients and Methods This was a comparative prospective randomized study conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals, over 40 patients devided into 2 groups. First group was composed of 20 patients who underwent SASJ operation, and second group was composed of 20 patients who underwent OAGB operation. Results The mean excess weight loss percentage after 6 months of SASJ group of patients was 51.55% ± 15.11, and 58.30% ± 24.32 in OAGB group. Both groups showed excellent outcomes as regards comorbidities resolution. In OAGB group, there was 1 patient who had postoperative bleeding. In SASJ group, we had one case of reflux alkaline gastritis that needed readmission. In addition, we had one case (5%) that needed reoperation and conversion to Roux-en Y configuration. In SASJ group, there were 7 patients complained from bile reflux, and 3 patients in OAGB group. In SASJ group of patients we had only 1 patient who developed postoperative gall bladder stones, and 6 patients in OAGB group. Conclusion Both OAGB and SASJ are effective bariatric procedures as regards weight loss and comorbidities resolution such as DM, HTN and hyperlipidemia. Incidence of biliary reflux was found more among the SASJ patients, but it was almost overcomed after performing the antireflux suture.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SAS-J) with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) — A S Zaher, M Elbanna, et al. · QJM (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS