A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Comparing Clipping versus Thermal Ablation in Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Treatment of Hyperhidrosis

Abstract Background Hyperhidrosis can be defined as a pathologic condition characterized by excessive sweating beyond the body’s physiological needs to maintain its temperature within an adequate range. Aim of the Work The aim of this work is to Compare Clipping Versus Thermal Ablation in Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy according to the effectiveness, recurrence, and reversibility for Treatment of hyperhidrosis. Patients and Methods A randomized comparative prospective study was conducted in general and vascular surgery departments in Ain Shams University Hospital and Nasser institute hospital for research and treatment. The study included 20 patients diagnosed with primary hyperhidrosis either palmer and/or axillary. Results In our study the operative time in group A ranged from 55 – 81 minutes with mean time of 68.00 ± 8.78 minutes, While in group B, Time ranged from 45 – 70 minutes with mean time of 55.20 ± 8.59 minutes and that difference was statistically significant (P=0.004), despite that the difference between the operative time of the 2 groups was statistically significant, yet it was only about 12 minutes. The previous results indicated high success rate for both procedures and that there is no statistically significant difference between the two techniques regarding the efficacy, yet the clipping technique offered the theoretical reversibility. In our study no patients requested reversal of the effect even those who suffered from postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis and all patients were satisfied with the result of the procedure. Conclusion Our study found that there is no statistically significant difference between the clipping and the cautery technique regarding operative time, rate of complication, compensatory hyperhidrosis, patient satisfaction and success rate, Yet the clipping technique has the potential theoritical reversibility in case of severe compensatory hyperhidrosis developed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.292
Primary Topic
Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Comparing Clipping versus Thermal Ablation in Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Treatment of Hyperhidrosis

M. Rizk, Ahmed Adel Ain Shoka, Mahmoud Adel Abdel Samee Hassab Allah
QJM
Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
article

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Comparing Clipping versus Thermal Ablation in Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy for Treatment of Hyperhidrosis

M. Rizk, Ahmed Adel Ain Shoka, Mahmoud Adel Abdel Samee Hassab Allah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hyperhidrosis can be defined as a pathologic condition characterized by excessive sweating beyond the body’s physiological needs to maintain its temperature within an adequate range. Aim of the Work The aim of this work is to Compare Clipping Versus Thermal Ablation in Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy according to the effectiveness, recurrence, and reversibility for Treatment of hyperhidrosis. Patients and Methods A randomized comparative prospective study was conducted in general and vascular surgery departments in Ain Shams University Hospital and Nasser institute hospital for research and treatment. The study included 20 patients diagnosed with primary hyperhidrosis either palmer and/or axillary. Results In our study the operative time in group A ranged from 55 – 81 minutes with mean time of 68.00 ± 8.78 minutes, While in group B, Time ranged from 45 – 70 minutes with mean time of 55.20 ± 8.59 minutes and that difference was statistically significant (P=0.004), despite that the difference between the operative time of the 2 groups was statistically significant, yet it was only about 12 minutes. The previous results indicated high success rate for both procedures and that there is no statistically significant difference between the two techniques regarding the efficacy, yet the clipping technique offered the theoretical reversibility. In our study no patients requested reversal of the effect even those who suffered from postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis and all patients were satisfied with the result of the procedure. Conclusion Our study found that there is no statistically significant difference between the clipping and the cautery technique regarding operative time, rate of complication, compensatory hyperhidrosis, patient satisfaction and success rate, Yet the clipping technique has the potential theoritical reversibility in case of severe compensatory hyperhidrosis developed.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.