Independent Political Networks: Comparing the Discussion Network Size and Composition of Partisans, Leaners, and Independents

Abstract Most prior U.S. political discussion research has failed to pay close attention to the networks of political independents, and to the differences between true partisans, leaners, and true independents. This is in direct contrast to the (appropriately) growing research attention paid to the decades-long rise in the proportion of independents and the decline of true partisans. This study presents representative U.S. survey data that compares political discussion frequency, network size, and the partisan composition of the discussion networks of partisans, leaners, and independents. After applying controls for ideological strength and political interest, we find that the three groups do not differ in discussion frequency or network size. However, there are meaningful differences across the groups in three different network composition measures, including partisan bias. We interpret our findings in the context of both applied measurement considerations and normative democratic expectations of partisan diversity within discussion networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09985-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Independent Political Networks: Comparing the Discussion Network Size and Composition of Partisans, Leaners, and Independents

William P. Eveland, William Gee
2 citations
Political Behavior
Social Media and Politics
1.91
article

Independent Political Networks: Comparing the Discussion Network Size and Composition of Partisans, Leaners, and Independents

William P. Eveland, William Gee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Most prior U.S. political discussion research has failed to pay close attention to the networks of political independents, and to the differences between true partisans, leaners, and true independents. This is in direct contrast to the (appropriately) growing research attention paid to the decades-long rise in the proportion of independents and the decline of true partisans. This study presents representative U.S. survey data that compares political discussion frequency, network size, and the partisan composition of the discussion networks of partisans, leaners, and independents. After applying controls for ideological strength and political interest, we find that the three groups do not differ in discussion frequency or network size. However, there are meaningful differences across the groups in three different network composition measures, including partisan bias. We interpret our findings in the context of both applied measurement considerations and normative democratic expectations of partisan diversity within discussion networks.

Political BehaviorVol. 47(3)
The Ohio State University (US)
Ohio State University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Social Media and Politics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Independent Political Networks: Comparing the Discussion Network Size and Composition of Partisans, Leaners, and Independents — William P. Eveland, William Gee · Political Behavior (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS