Study on the Liquid‐Holding Rate Law of Gas–Water–Foam Three‐Phase Flow in a Wavy Pipe

ABSTRACT As a common method for liquid drainage in wave‐shaped pipelines, foam drainage has been used in gas‐gathering pipelines in various oil and gas fields. One of the common problems encountered in wave‐shaped foam drainage pipelines is the inaccurate prediction of the liquid retention rate. This issue makes it difficult to predict liquid accumulation points, which affects gas output efficiency, causes pipeline corrosion, and generates natural gas hydrates. To clarify the liquid‐holding rate law of wavy foam drainage pipelines is studied. In this study, through experiments to verify the accuracy of the numerical simulation method, we investigate the easiest liquid accumulation points and the liquid‐holding rate of wave‐shaped foam drainage pipelines, with factors such as inlet gas velocity, inlet liquid velocity, import and export differential pressure, undulation angle, and inlet temperature change rule. Among them, the error between the numerical simulation results and the experimental results is 4.68%. Finally, after considering the influence of the aforementioned factors on the liquid retention rate of wave‐shaped pipelines, a new liquid retention rate calculation model for wave‐shaped pipelines with foam drainage is established by introducing dimensionless numbers, such as gas‐phase velocity coefficient, liquid‐phase velocity coefficient, and angle correction coefficient. The method is compared with the results of previous research, and the error is within 15%. The model has a simple form and high calculation accuracy, providing a theoretical basis for pipeline inspectors to predict liquid accumulation conditions and reasonably adjust production schedules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Liquid‐Holding Rate Law of Gas–Water–Foam Three‐Phase Flow in a Wavy Pipe

Jian Wu, Bin Ma, Wei Wang, Zhenhua Wu et al.
1 citations
Energy Science & Engineering
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
0.18
article

Study on the Liquid‐Holding Rate Law of Gas–Water–Foam Three‐Phase Flow in a Wavy Pipe

Jian Wu, Bin Ma, Wei Wang, Zhenhua Wu, Ruiquan Liao, Yang Hui, Wang Guowei, Xu Longyu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a common method for liquid drainage in wave‐shaped pipelines, foam drainage has been used in gas‐gathering pipelines in various oil and gas fields. One of the common problems encountered in wave‐shaped foam drainage pipelines is the inaccurate prediction of the liquid retention rate. This issue makes it difficult to predict liquid accumulation points, which affects gas output efficiency, causes pipeline corrosion, and generates natural gas hydrates. To clarify the liquid‐holding rate law of wavy foam drainage pipelines is studied. In this study, through experiments to verify the accuracy of the numerical simulation method, we investigate the easiest liquid accumulation points and the liquid‐holding rate of wave‐shaped foam drainage pipelines, with factors such as inlet gas velocity, inlet liquid velocity, import and export differential pressure, undulation angle, and inlet temperature change rule. Among them, the error between the numerical simulation results and the experimental results is 4.68%. Finally, after considering the influence of the aforementioned factors on the liquid retention rate of wave‐shaped pipelines, a new liquid retention rate calculation model for wave‐shaped pipelines with foam drainage is established by introducing dimensionless numbers, such as gas‐phase velocity coefficient, liquid‐phase velocity coefficient, and angle correction coefficient. The method is compared with the results of previous research, and the error is within 15%. The model has a simple form and high calculation accuracy, providing a theoretical basis for pipeline inspectors to predict liquid accumulation conditions and reasonably adjust production schedules.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 12(12)
Yangtze University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.