A Roadmap of Noninstitutional Living Options for People with Dementia: “Don’t Fence Me In”

Canadians overwhelmingly do not want to live in long-term care institutions (LTCIs) when they age; yet many end up there for lack of home care, because family care partners burn out, or because they and their professional advisors are unaware of alternatives to institutions. Not only is institutional dementia care riven with problems, it segregates disabled people, thereby abrogating human rights. Because systemic ageism and ableism cloud seniors' care, institutions remain the default option for Canadians with dementia. Yet, decades of deinstitutionalization enabled younger disabled Canadians to live in the community with supports. Why not seniors? We describe a plethora of noninstitutional dementia-care alternatives. We then present a roadmap for considering all relevant care options in service plans, one that incorporates supported decision making by people with dementia. We propose a paradigm shift in how Canada serves its senior citizens - not just the current generation, but those to come, including ourselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980824000308
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Roadmap of Noninstitutional Living Options for People with Dementia: “Don’t Fence Me In”

Maude Lévesque, Margaret Oldfield
1 citations
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
0.85
article

A Roadmap of Noninstitutional Living Options for People with Dementia: “Don’t Fence Me In”

Maude Lévesque, Margaret Oldfield
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Canadians overwhelmingly do not want to live in long-term care institutions (LTCIs) when they age; yet many end up there for lack of home care, because family care partners burn out, or because they and their professional advisors are unaware of alternatives to institutions. Not only is institutional dementia care riven with problems, it segregates disabled people, thereby abrogating human rights. Because systemic ageism and ableism cloud seniors' care, institutions remain the default option for Canadians with dementia. Yet, decades of deinstitutionalization enabled younger disabled Canadians to live in the community with supports. Why not seniors? We describe a plethora of noninstitutional dementia-care alternatives. We then present a roadmap for considering all relevant care options in service plans, one that incorporates supported decision making by people with dementia. We propose a paradigm shift in how Canada serves its senior citizens - not just the current generation, but those to come, including ourselves.

Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissementVol. 44(1)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.