“Constantly justifying my existence”: Lower-income, higher-weight Canadian adults’ stigma coping mechanisms

Individuals who are higher-weight and low-income may disproportionately experience weight and income stigmas in healthcare experiences compared to lower-weight, higher-income individuals. The ways that weight and income stigmas interact in healthcare should be better understood in order to provide better, less stigmatizing care to higher-weight, low-income patients. This study assesses how patients manage stigmatizing experiences in both healthcare and everyday experiences and how that impacts health seeking and stigma management behaviors through semi-structured interviews with 11 higher-weight (Body Mass Index ≥30), low-income adults (≥18 years of age) in an Atlantic Canadian province. Participants took part in two interviews that focused on healthcare experiences and both positive and negative places/spaces. The two face-to-face interviews for each participant (total 21 interviews) were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring concepts and patterns within the data. Two major themes emerged from the data, <i>uptake of stigmatizing, neoliberal health messaging</i> and <i>coping with stigma</i>. <i>Coping with stigma</i> included subthemes <i>control over stigmatizing experiences</i> and <i>stoicism in the face of stigma</i>. The findings suggest that individuals understand their health and wellness through a neoliberal lens and that they deploy strategies of control and stoicism to cope with the stigmas they face.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2024.12480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Constantly justifying my existence”: Lower-income, higher-weight Canadian adults’ stigma coping mechanisms

Lee Turner
1 citations
Qualitative Research in Medicine & Healthcare
Obesity and Health Practices
0.94
article

“Constantly justifying my existence”: Lower-income, higher-weight Canadian adults’ stigma coping mechanisms

Lee Turner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Individuals who are higher-weight and low-income may disproportionately experience weight and income stigmas in healthcare experiences compared to lower-weight, higher-income individuals. The ways that weight and income stigmas interact in healthcare should be better understood in order to provide better, less stigmatizing care to higher-weight, low-income patients. This study assesses how patients manage stigmatizing experiences in both healthcare and everyday experiences and how that impacts health seeking and stigma management behaviors through semi-structured interviews with 11 higher-weight (Body Mass Index ≥30), low-income adults (≥18 years of age) in an Atlantic Canadian province. Participants took part in two interviews that focused on healthcare experiences and both positive and negative places/spaces. The two face-to-face interviews for each participant (total 21 interviews) were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring concepts and patterns within the data. Two major themes emerged from the data, <i>uptake of stigmatizing, neoliberal health messaging</i> and <i>coping with stigma</i>. <i>Coping with stigma</i> included subthemes <i>control over stigmatizing experiences</i> and <i>stoicism in the face of stigma</i>. The findings suggest that individuals understand their health and wellness through a neoliberal lens and that they deploy strategies of control and stoicism to cope with the stigmas they face.

Qualitative Research in Medicine & HealthcareVol. 8(3)
University of New Brunswick (CA)
Fondation de la recherche en santé du Nouveau-Brunswick
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Obesity and Health Practices
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.