A Ratio Estimator for the Mean Using a Mixture Optional Enhance Trust (MOET) Randomized Response Model

When researchers conduct surveys seeking sensitive, socially stigmatized information, respondents, on average, modify their answers to represent themselves favorably. To overcome this issue, researchers may use Randomized Response Technique (RRT) models. Recently, Parker et al. proposed a model that incorporates some of the most critical recent quantitative RRT advancements—mixture, optionality, and enhanced trust—into a single model, which they called a Mixture Optional Enhanced (MOET) model. We now improve upon the MOET model by incorporating auxiliary information into the analysis. Positively correlated auxiliary information can improve the mean response estimation through use of a ratio estimator. In this study, we propose just such an estimator for the MOET model. Further, we investigate the conditions under which the ratio estimator outperforms the basic MOET estimator proposed by Parker et al. in 2024. We also consider the possibility that the collection of auxiliary information may compromise privacy; and we study the impact of privacy reduction on the overall model performance as assessed by the unified measure (UM) proposed by Gupta et al. in 2018.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12223617
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Ratio Estimator for the Mean Using a Mixture Optional Enhance Trust (MOET) Randomized Response Model

Michael H. Parker, Sadia Khalil, Sat Gupta
3 citations
Mathematics
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
2.13
article

A Ratio Estimator for the Mean Using a Mixture Optional Enhance Trust (MOET) Randomized Response Model

Michael H. Parker, Sadia Khalil, Sat Gupta
article en
3 citations

Abstract

When researchers conduct surveys seeking sensitive, socially stigmatized information, respondents, on average, modify their answers to represent themselves favorably. To overcome this issue, researchers may use Randomized Response Technique (RRT) models. Recently, Parker et al. proposed a model that incorporates some of the most critical recent quantitative RRT advancements—mixture, optionality, and enhanced trust—into a single model, which they called a Mixture Optional Enhanced (MOET) model. We now improve upon the MOET model by incorporating auxiliary information into the analysis. Positively correlated auxiliary information can improve the mean response estimation through use of a ratio estimator. In this study, we propose just such an estimator for the MOET model. Further, we investigate the conditions under which the ratio estimator outperforms the basic MOET estimator proposed by Parker et al. in 2024. We also consider the possibility that the collection of auxiliary information may compromise privacy; and we study the impact of privacy reduction on the overall model performance as assessed by the unified measure (UM) proposed by Gupta et al. in 2018.

MathematicsVol. 12(22)
Lahore College for Women University (PK), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Greensboro College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
2.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Ratio Estimator for the Mean Using a Mixture Optional Enhance Trust (MOET) Randomized Response Model — Michael H. Parker, Sadia Khalil, et al. · Mathematics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS