Model Checking and Verification of Synchronisation Properties of Cobot Welding

This paper describes use of model checking to verify synchronisation properties of an industrial welding system consisting of a cobot arm and an external turntable. The robots must move synchronously, but sometimes get out of synchronisation, giving rise to unsatisfactory weld qualities in problem areas, such as around corners. These mistakes are costly, since time is lost both in the robotic welding and in manual repairs needed to improve the weld. Verification of the synchronisation properties has shown that they are fulfilled as long as assumptions of correctness made about parts outside the scope of the model hold, indicating limitations in the hardware. These results have indicated the source of the problem, and motivated a re-calibration of the real-life system. This has drastically improved the welding results, and is a demonstration of how formal methods can be useful in an industrial setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.411.6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Checking and Verification of Synchronisation Properties of Cobot Welding

Pedro Ribeiro, David A. Anisi, Yvonne Murray, Ana Cavalcanti et al.
1 citations
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
0.35
article

Model Checking and Verification of Synchronisation Properties of Cobot Welding

Pedro Ribeiro, David A. Anisi, Yvonne Murray, Ana Cavalcanti, Henrik Nordlie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper describes use of model checking to verify synchronisation properties of an industrial welding system consisting of a cobot arm and an external turntable. The robots must move synchronously, but sometimes get out of synchronisation, giving rise to unsatisfactory weld qualities in problem areas, such as around corners. These mistakes are costly, since time is lost both in the robotic welding and in manual repairs needed to improve the weld. Verification of the synchronisation properties has shown that they are fulfilled as long as assumptions of correctness made about parts outside the scope of the model hold, indicating limitations in the hardware. These results have indicated the source of the problem, and motivated a re-calibration of the real-life system. This has drastically improved the welding results, and is a demonstration of how formal methods can be useful in an industrial setting.

Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer ScienceVol. 411
University of Agder (NO), University of York (GB), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
UK Research and Innovation, Royal Academy of Engineering, Norges Forskningsråd, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.