Using Formal Models, Safety Shields and Certified Control to Validate AI-Based Train Systems

The certification of autonomous systems is an important concern in science and industry. The KI-LOK project explores new methods for certifying and safely integrating AI components into autonomous trains. We pursued a two-layered approach: (1) ensuring the safety of the steering system by formal analysis using the B method, and (2) improving the reliability of the perception system with a runtime certificate checker. This work links both strategies within a demonstrator that runs simulations on the formal model, controlled by the real AI output and the real certificate checker. The demonstrator is integrated into the validation tool ProB. This enables runtime monitoring, runtime verification, and statistical validation of formal safety properties using a formal B model. Consequently, one can detect and analyse potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses of the AI and the certificate checker. We apply these techniques to a signal detection case study and present our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.411.10
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Formal Models, Safety Shields and Certified Control to Validate AI-Based Train Systems

Fabian Vu, Michaël Leuschel, Jan Gruteser, Jan Roßbach
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

Using Formal Models, Safety Shields and Certified Control to Validate AI-Based Train Systems

Fabian Vu, Michaël Leuschel, Jan Gruteser, Jan Roßbach
article en

Abstract

The certification of autonomous systems is an important concern in science and industry. The KI-LOK project explores new methods for certifying and safely integrating AI components into autonomous trains. We pursued a two-layered approach: (1) ensuring the safety of the steering system by formal analysis using the B method, and (2) improving the reliability of the perception system with a runtime certificate checker. This work links both strategies within a demonstrator that runs simulations on the formal model, controlled by the real AI output and the real certificate checker. The demonstrator is integrated into the validation tool ProB. This enables runtime monitoring, runtime verification, and statistical validation of formal safety properties using a formal B model. Consequently, one can detect and analyse potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses of the AI and the certificate checker. We apply these techniques to a signal detection case study and present our findings.

Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer ScienceVol. 411
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Austrian Science Fund, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.