МІСЦЕВІ ВИБОРИ В ТУРЕЧЧИНІ 2024:КІНЕЦЬ ПРАВЛІННЯ ЕРДОГАНА ЧИ НОВІ МОЖЛИВОСТІ ДЕМОКРАТИЧНОГО СВІТУ?

The unexpected victory of the opposition Republican People’s Party in Turkey’s local elections on March 31 raised intriguing questions about the future of Presi- dent R. T. Erdogan after more than two decades in power. Only 10 months after being appointed to a new term, a significant portion of voters voted against him and the Justice and Development Party, his biggest defeat in history. The presi- dent acknowledged the magnitude of this defeat, calling the results “not only a loss of voters, but also a loss of soul and blood.” This article analyzes the factors that contributed to this outcome and argues that it was more a protest by Turk- ish voters than a direct endorsement of the opposition’s policies. People voted against Erdogan’s arrogance and authoritarian style, as well as against the low quality of his party’s candidates, the deteriorating economy, especially for pen- sioners, and the rapidly deteriorating justice system. Four factors help frame this shift in political support for Erdogan: a deteriorating economy, especially for pensioners whose purchasing power has plummeted; a declining sense of justice due to reports detailing the corruption of the judiciary from the top; Erdogan’s arrogance and authoritarian style and the poor quality of his candidates; and the CHP’s new image as the center of the opposition. Understanding the factors that led to this unprecedented electoral defeat is crucial to predicting the future of Turkish politics. The main opposition party has also benefited from skillful leadership less than a year after its defeat in the presidential election. While the outcome of the 2024 vote indicates a desire for democratic governance and accountability, it remains unclear at this early stage whether this is a temporary deviation from the authori- tarian style of Turkish politics. The implications of this political change for the international community are discussed. The results of the local elections offered Turkey a new way forward. They demonstrate that the vision of uniting secular- ists, nationalists, conservatives, Turks, Kurds, Sunnis, and Alevis around a com- mon vision for the country is not just an idealistic dream. The voters’ initiative to bridge these divisions suggests that this vision will soon be possible to realize. This key moment underscores the need for parties, especially the CHP, to em- brace inclusiveness and take bold initiatives to become a political home for all citizens. Looking to the future, officials, party leaders and elites should strive for greater unity among the country’s diverse population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Міжнародні відносини суспільні комунікації та регіональні студії
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2024-02-117-129
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

МІСЦЕВІ ВИБОРИ В ТУРЕЧЧИНІ 2024:КІНЕЦЬ ПРАВЛІННЯ ЕРДОГАНА ЧИ НОВІ МОЖЛИВОСТІ ДЕМОКРАТИЧНОГО СВІТУ?

Iryna Kiyanka, Ілля Туровський
Міжнародні відносини суспільні комунікації та регіональні студії
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

МІСЦЕВІ ВИБОРИ В ТУРЕЧЧИНІ 2024:КІНЕЦЬ ПРАВЛІННЯ ЕРДОГАНА ЧИ НОВІ МОЖЛИВОСТІ ДЕМОКРАТИЧНОГО СВІТУ?

Iryna Kiyanka, Ілля Туровський
article en

Abstract

The unexpected victory of the opposition Republican People’s Party in Turkey’s local elections on March 31 raised intriguing questions about the future of Presi- dent R. T. Erdogan after more than two decades in power. Only 10 months after being appointed to a new term, a significant portion of voters voted against him and the Justice and Development Party, his biggest defeat in history. The presi- dent acknowledged the magnitude of this defeat, calling the results “not only a loss of voters, but also a loss of soul and blood.” This article analyzes the factors that contributed to this outcome and argues that it was more a protest by Turk- ish voters than a direct endorsement of the opposition’s policies. People voted against Erdogan’s arrogance and authoritarian style, as well as against the low quality of his party’s candidates, the deteriorating economy, especially for pen- sioners, and the rapidly deteriorating justice system. Four factors help frame this shift in political support for Erdogan: a deteriorating economy, especially for pensioners whose purchasing power has plummeted; a declining sense of justice due to reports detailing the corruption of the judiciary from the top; Erdogan’s arrogance and authoritarian style and the poor quality of his candidates; and the CHP’s new image as the center of the opposition. Understanding the factors that led to this unprecedented electoral defeat is crucial to predicting the future of Turkish politics. The main opposition party has also benefited from skillful leadership less than a year after its defeat in the presidential election. While the outcome of the 2024 vote indicates a desire for democratic governance and accountability, it remains unclear at this early stage whether this is a temporary deviation from the authori- tarian style of Turkish politics. The implications of this political change for the international community are discussed. The results of the local elections offered Turkey a new way forward. They demonstrate that the vision of uniting secular- ists, nationalists, conservatives, Turks, Kurds, Sunnis, and Alevis around a com- mon vision for the country is not just an idealistic dream. The voters’ initiative to bridge these divisions suggests that this vision will soon be possible to realize. This key moment underscores the need for parties, especially the CHP, to em- brace inclusiveness and take bold initiatives to become a political home for all citizens. Looking to the future, officials, party leaders and elites should strive for greater unity among the country’s diverse population.

Міжнародні відносини суспільні комунікації та регіональні студії(2 (19))
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.