Are social media “Influencers” leaders? Exploring student perceptions of social media influencers in the context of leadership and followership

Purpose This purpose of the study was to investigate, analyze, and make meaning of student perceptions of social media influencers in the context of leadership and followership. Design/methodology/approach We investigated whether students perceive social media influencers as leaders, their perceptions of the difference between followers and fans, and the degree of responsibility influencers have over their followers’ behaviors. Existing qualitative data were obtained from n = 41 participants for the study. We used elements of phenomenology within a single case study design (introductory leadership course) to thematically review and analyze students’ discussion posts and agree on common themes. Findings Our findings show that most students do not believe influencers are leaders based on value differences between influencers and leaders broadly. Students perceived followers as more actively engaged than fans based on their ability to work alongside leaders, while fans are more passive by only consuming and admiring influencers’ content. Lastly, most students noted that influencers are responsible for the behaviors of their followers and should have more awareness of their power and influence online. Originality/value As social media continues to influence the perceptions of the younger generations of leaders, our findings seek to provide insights into the evolving and dynamic nature of leadership and followership in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Leadership Education
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jole-07-2024-0084
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are social media “Influencers” leaders? Exploring student perceptions of social media influencers in the context of leadership and followership

Austin Council, Olamide Olowoyo
2 citations
Journal of Leadership Education
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
2.26
article

Are social media “Influencers” leaders? Exploring student perceptions of social media influencers in the context of leadership and followership

Austin Council, Olamide Olowoyo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This purpose of the study was to investigate, analyze, and make meaning of student perceptions of social media influencers in the context of leadership and followership. Design/methodology/approach We investigated whether students perceive social media influencers as leaders, their perceptions of the difference between followers and fans, and the degree of responsibility influencers have over their followers’ behaviors. Existing qualitative data were obtained from n = 41 participants for the study. We used elements of phenomenology within a single case study design (introductory leadership course) to thematically review and analyze students’ discussion posts and agree on common themes. Findings Our findings show that most students do not believe influencers are leaders based on value differences between influencers and leaders broadly. Students perceived followers as more actively engaged than fans based on their ability to work alongside leaders, while fans are more passive by only consuming and admiring influencers’ content. Lastly, most students noted that influencers are responsible for the behaviors of their followers and should have more awareness of their power and influence online. Originality/value As social media continues to influence the perceptions of the younger generations of leaders, our findings seek to provide insights into the evolving and dynamic nature of leadership and followership in the digital age.

Journal of Leadership EducationVol. 25(1)
New Leaders (US), Virginia Tech (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.