L’iconicité diagrammatique dans les expressions idiomatiques : une comparaison chinois/français

Idiomatic expressions (hereafter IE) are often considered arbitrary. Nevertheless, their non-arbitrariness is supported at semantic level, especially by semantic-cognitive research, but also at structural level. This study investigates the orle of semantic constraints in the ordering of three types of “binomial” constituents in IEs: numerical, spatial, and temporal, through a comparative analysis of French and Chines, two languages that are typologically and culturally distant. Relying primarily on the work of Cooper and Ross (1975) and Tang (1988), we investigate the extent to which these orders might reflect diagrammatic iconicity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Signifiances (Signifying)
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52497/signifiances.v7i1.358
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

L’iconicité diagrammatique dans les expressions idiomatiques : une comparaison chinois/français

Signifiances (Signifying)
Categorization, perception, and language
article

L’iconicité diagrammatique dans les expressions idiomatiques : une comparaison chinois/français

article en

Abstract

Idiomatic expressions (hereafter IE) are often considered arbitrary. Nevertheless, their non-arbitrariness is supported at semantic level, especially by semantic-cognitive research, but also at structural level. This study investigates the orle of semantic constraints in the ordering of three types of “binomial” constituents in IEs: numerical, spatial, and temporal, through a comparative analysis of French and Chines, two languages that are typologically and culturally distant. Relying primarily on the work of Cooper and Ross (1975) and Tang (1988), we investigate the extent to which these orders might reflect diagrammatic iconicity.

Signifiances (Signifying)Vol. 7(1)
Université de Lille (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.