Comparative Evaluation of Consumer Wearable Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Validation Study
In this study population, the discrimination between sinus rhythm and AF using CWDs based on ECG or PPG was highly accurate, with no significant variations in performance across the examined devices.
Authors
- Dieter Nuyens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-3273)
- Julie Vranken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2691-0569)
- Zoë Pieters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7288-4461)
- Máximo Rivero‐Ayerza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8947-0467)
- Henri Gruwez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-265X)
- Peter Haemers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-1281)
- Femke Wouters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-6372)
- C. J. P. P. Smeets (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1746-7585)
- Laurent Pison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8518-3330)
- Hugo Van Herendael (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-2370)
- Pieter M. Vandervoort (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-6500)
- Anessa Pijalovic
- Wouter Wilms
Institutions
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE)
- Hasselt University (BE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR Formative Research
- Published
- 2024-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/65139
- Citations
- 12
- Primary Topic
- Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.21
Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Limburg Sterk Merk
- Universiteit Hasselt
- Vlaamse regering