Moving from Traits to the Dynamic Process: The Next Steps in Research on Human Resilience

The current literature on resilience shows a trend toward a dynamic process conceptualization, moving away from the previous trait-approach. However, the term “dynamic” is increasingly treated as a buzzword and is thereby oversimplified in the literature. The aim of this article is to develop a unified language pertaining to resilience as a dynamic process, so as to ensure progress in this field. First, we briefly introduce the traditional trait approach alongside the implicit assumption on which it is built. Next, we contrast this approach by discussing what dynamics entail and how this approach differs from mainstream psychological approaches. Specifically, dynamics argue for mapping out a change process per se, rather than identifying whether or not a change has occurred through simple linear fit models. These dynamic processes typically emerge from complex interactions between multiple variables, which result in nonlinear patterns like sudden gains or losses. Consequently, we advocate for future research avenues built on repeated measurements at high frequencies that result time series data which provides insights into how the resilience process unfolds over time. Gaining insights into such temporal patterns also has a direct influence on practical applications including approaches for both prevention and psychotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2024.2431733
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving from Traits to the Dynamic Process: The Next Steps in Research on Human Resilience

Bernard Ricca, Yannick Hill, Ruud J. R. Den Hartigh, Michael L. Dolezal et al.
8 citations
Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma
Resilience and Mental Health
5.11
article

Moving from Traits to the Dynamic Process: The Next Steps in Research on Human Resilience

Bernard Ricca, Yannick Hill, Ruud J. R. Den Hartigh, Michael L. Dolezal, Patric C. Nordbeck, Adam W. Kiefer, David W. Pincus
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The current literature on resilience shows a trend toward a dynamic process conceptualization, moving away from the previous trait-approach. However, the term “dynamic” is increasingly treated as a buzzword and is thereby oversimplified in the literature. The aim of this article is to develop a unified language pertaining to resilience as a dynamic process, so as to ensure progress in this field. First, we briefly introduce the traditional trait approach alongside the implicit assumption on which it is built. Next, we contrast this approach by discussing what dynamics entail and how this approach differs from mainstream psychological approaches. Specifically, dynamics argue for mapping out a change process per se, rather than identifying whether or not a change has occurred through simple linear fit models. These dynamic processes typically emerge from complex interactions between multiple variables, which result in nonlinear patterns like sudden gains or losses. Consequently, we advocate for future research avenues built on repeated measurements at high frequencies that result time series data which provides insights into how the resilience process unfolds over time. Gaining insights into such temporal patterns also has a direct influence on practical applications including approaches for both prevention and psychotherapy.

Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & TraumaVol. 34(7)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Chapman University (US), Lund University (SE), University of Washington (US), University of Colorado System (US), Seattle University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Resilience and Mental Health
5.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.