Beyond Individual Tests: Youths’ Cognitive Abilities, Basic Reading, and Writing

Broadly, individuals' cognitive abilities influence their academic skills, but the significance and strength of specific cognitive abilities varies across academic domains and may vary across age. Simultaneous analyses of data from many tests and cross-battery analyses can address inconsistent findings from prior studies by creating comprehensively defined constructs, which allow for greater generalizability of findings. The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-battery direct effects and developmental differences in youths' cognitive abilities on their basic reading abilities, as well as the relations between their reading and writing achievement. Our sample included 3927 youth aged 6 to 18. Six intelligence tests (66 subtests) and three achievement tests (10 subtests) were analyzed. Youths' general intelligence (<i>g</i>, large direct and indirect effects), verbal comprehension-knowledge (large direct effect), working memory (large direct effect), and learning efficiency (moderate direct effect) explained their basic reading skills. The influence of <i>g</i> and fluid reasoning were difficult to separate statistically. Most of the cognitive-basic reading relations were stable across age, except the influence of verbal comprehension-knowledge (Gc), which appeared to slightly increase with age. Youths' basic reading had large influences on their written expression and spelling skills, and their spelling skills had a large influence on their written expression skills. The directionality of the effects most strongly supported the direct effects from the youths' basic reading to their spelling skills, and not vice versa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligence
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110120
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Individual Tests: Youths’ Cognitive Abilities, Basic Reading, and Writing

Jacqueline M. Caemmerer, Matthew R. Reynolds, Audrey M. Scudder, Timothy Z. Keith
3 citations
Journal of Intelligence
Reading and Literacy Development
2.37
article

Beyond Individual Tests: Youths’ Cognitive Abilities, Basic Reading, and Writing

Jacqueline M. Caemmerer, Matthew R. Reynolds, Audrey M. Scudder, Timothy Z. Keith
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Broadly, individuals' cognitive abilities influence their academic skills, but the significance and strength of specific cognitive abilities varies across academic domains and may vary across age. Simultaneous analyses of data from many tests and cross-battery analyses can address inconsistent findings from prior studies by creating comprehensively defined constructs, which allow for greater generalizability of findings. The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-battery direct effects and developmental differences in youths' cognitive abilities on their basic reading abilities, as well as the relations between their reading and writing achievement. Our sample included 3927 youth aged 6 to 18. Six intelligence tests (66 subtests) and three achievement tests (10 subtests) were analyzed. Youths' general intelligence (<i>g</i>, large direct and indirect effects), verbal comprehension-knowledge (large direct effect), working memory (large direct effect), and learning efficiency (moderate direct effect) explained their basic reading skills. The influence of <i>g</i> and fluid reasoning were difficult to separate statistically. Most of the cognitive-basic reading relations were stable across age, except the influence of verbal comprehension-knowledge (Gc), which appeared to slightly increase with age. Youths' basic reading had large influences on their written expression and spelling skills, and their spelling skills had a large influence on their written expression skills. The directionality of the effects most strongly supported the direct effects from the youths' basic reading to their spelling skills, and not vice versa.

Journal of IntelligenceVol. 12(11)
University of Connecticut (US), University of Kansas (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reading and Literacy Development
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.