Detection of diagnostic somatic copy number alterations from cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA in brain tumor patients

The gold standard for precise diagnostic classification of brain tumors requires tissue sampling, which carries relevant procedural risks. Brain biopsies often have limited sensitivity and fail to address tumor heterogeneity, because small tissue parts are being examined. This study aims to explore the detection and quantification of diagnostically relevant somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a real-world cohort of patients with defined brain tumor subtypes. A total of 33 CSF samples were collected from 30 patients for cfDNA extraction. Shallow whole-genome sequencing was conducted on CSF samples containing > 3ng of cfDNA and corresponding tissue DNA from nine patients. The sequencing cohort encompassed 26 samples of 23 patients, comprising 12 with confirmed CNS cancer as compared to 11 patients with either ambiguous CNS lesions (n = 5) or non-cancer CNS lesions (n = 6). After mapping and quality filtering SCNAs were called by depth-of-coverage analyses with a binning of 5.5 Mbp. SCNAs were exclusively identified in CSF cfDNA from brain tumor patients (10/12, 83%). In tumor patients, SCNAs were detectable in cfDNA from all patients with, but also in five of seven patients without tumor cells detected by CSF cytopathology. A substantial number of shared SCNAs were traceable between tissue and CSF in matched pair analyses. Additionally, some SCNAs unique to either CSF or tissue indicating spatial heterogeneity or tumor evolution. Also, diagnostically relevant genomic alterations as well as essential and desirable SCNAs as implemented in the current WHO classification of CNS tumors for certain primary brain tumor subtypes were traceable. In summary, this minimally invasive cfDNA-based LB approach employing shallow whole genome sequencing demonstrates potential for providing a molecularly informed diagnosis of CNS cancers, mapping tumor heterogeneity, tracking tumor evolution, and surveilling tumor patients. Further prospective trials are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-024-01887-9
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of diagnostic somatic copy number alterations from cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA in brain tumor patients

Michael Ronellenfitsch, Henning Reis, Patrick N. Harter, Philipp Euskirchen et al.
5 citations
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.43
article

Detection of diagnostic somatic copy number alterations from cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA in brain tumor patients

Michael Ronellenfitsch, Henning Reis, Patrick N. Harter, Philipp Euskirchen, Julia Beck, Peter Johannes Wild, Pia S. Zeiner, Svenja Klinsing, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Katharina Johanna Weber, Kai Uwe Chow, Ekkehard Schuetz, Bastian Roller, Joachim P. Steinbach, Hans Urban, Mareike Dettki
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The gold standard for precise diagnostic classification of brain tumors requires tissue sampling, which carries relevant procedural risks. Brain biopsies often have limited sensitivity and fail to address tumor heterogeneity, because small tissue parts are being examined. This study aims to explore the detection and quantification of diagnostically relevant somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a real-world cohort of patients with defined brain tumor subtypes. A total of 33 CSF samples were collected from 30 patients for cfDNA extraction. Shallow whole-genome sequencing was conducted on CSF samples containing > 3ng of cfDNA and corresponding tissue DNA from nine patients. The sequencing cohort encompassed 26 samples of 23 patients, comprising 12 with confirmed CNS cancer as compared to 11 patients with either ambiguous CNS lesions (n = 5) or non-cancer CNS lesions (n = 6). After mapping and quality filtering SCNAs were called by depth-of-coverage analyses with a binning of 5.5 Mbp. SCNAs were exclusively identified in CSF cfDNA from brain tumor patients (10/12, 83%). In tumor patients, SCNAs were detectable in cfDNA from all patients with, but also in five of seven patients without tumor cells detected by CSF cytopathology. A substantial number of shared SCNAs were traceable between tissue and CSF in matched pair analyses. Additionally, some SCNAs unique to either CSF or tissue indicating spatial heterogeneity or tumor evolution. Also, diagnostically relevant genomic alterations as well as essential and desirable SCNAs as implemented in the current WHO classification of CNS tumors for certain primary brain tumor subtypes were traceable. In summary, this minimally invasive cfDNA-based LB approach employing shallow whole genome sequencing demonstrates potential for providing a molecularly informed diagnosis of CNS cancers, mapping tumor heterogeneity, tracking tumor evolution, and surveilling tumor patients. Further prospective trials are warranted.

Acta Neuropathologica CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Ambulatory Rehabilitation Center Berlin Adlershof (DE), German Cancer Society (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), Frankfurt Cancer Institute (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Dr. Mildred Scheel Stiftung für Krebsforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.