The proportion and utilisation of formal kinship and network care in Norway and Denmark: a comparative study

In the past decades, the implementation of regulations and legislation, \nwhich encourage the use of formal kinship and network care, has taken \nplace in many countries. Yet, the proportion seems to vary greatly, also \nbetween countries often regarded as similar. Denmark and Norway are \nexamples of this. In 2021, 33% of children in care lived in kinship and \nnetwork care compared to 13% in Denmark. The aim of this paper is to \nget a better understanding of these differences. For this paper, we have \ndelved into the historical development of CWS in both countries, with \nparticular attention to the last 20 years. The factors suggested as \npossible reasons for differences in the proportion and utilisation of \nkinship and network care in Denmark and Norway, relate mainly to \nthree overlapping levels: policy and values, organisational structures \nand case management. Possible implications and limitations are \ndiscussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Work
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2024.2423381
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The proportion and utilisation of formal kinship and network care in Norway and Denmark: a comparative study

Jeanette Skoglund, Bo Morthorst Rasmussen, Renee Thørnblad
2 citations
European Journal of Social Work
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
2.26
article

The proportion and utilisation of formal kinship and network care in Norway and Denmark: a comparative study

Jeanette Skoglund, Bo Morthorst Rasmussen, Renee Thørnblad
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the past decades, the implementation of regulations and legislation, \nwhich encourage the use of formal kinship and network care, has taken \nplace in many countries. Yet, the proportion seems to vary greatly, also \nbetween countries often regarded as similar. Denmark and Norway are \nexamples of this. In 2021, 33% of children in care lived in kinship and \nnetwork care compared to 13% in Denmark. The aim of this paper is to \nget a better understanding of these differences. For this paper, we have \ndelved into the historical development of CWS in both countries, with \nparticular attention to the last 20 years. The factors suggested as \npossible reasons for differences in the proportion and utilisation of \nkinship and network care in Denmark and Norway, relate mainly to \nthree overlapping levels: policy and values, organisational structures \nand case management. Possible implications and limitations are \ndiscussed.

European Journal of Social WorkVol. 28(6)
University College South Denmark (DK), Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (NO), Sydor Technologies (United States) (US), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The proportion and utilisation of formal kinship and network care in Norway and Denmark: a comparative study — Jeanette Skoglund, Bo Morthorst Rasmussen, et al. · European Journal of Social Work (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS