Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos del NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire en Español para medir el Bienestar en combatientes de incendios forestales en México

Introduction: Firefighting in forests is a dangerous and demanding task, highlighting the need to understand the well-being of these workers through tools such as the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire in Spanish. However, this questionnaire has not been adapted and validated for the Mexican context. Objective: The study aimed to validate the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire in Spanish for forest firefighters in Mexico. Methods: A psychometric design was used, including content validation through expert judgment in validation, health, and work activities related to firefighting. The questionnaire incorporates five domains with a Likert scale, and the Aiken's V coefficient was used for validation. Results: Most items in the questionnaire showed an Aiken's V coefficient above 0.70, with 95% confidence intervals, indicating high content validity. There was concordance with the original validation of the instrument, enabling its application in the Mexican work context. Conclusion: The expert validation confirmed the relevance, coherence, and clarity of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire in Spanish for forest firefighters in Mexico. This analysis is a critical component of a broader project, laying the groundwork for subsequent stages including a pilot test and factorial analysis, as well as contributing to improving the safety and quality of life of these workers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v24i4.6056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stress and Burnout Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos del NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire en Español para medir el Bienestar en combatientes de incendios forestales en México

Silvia G. León-Cortés, Esmeralda Alcaraz Sánchez, Raúl Flores Carrillo
1 citations
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana
Stress and Burnout Research
0.64
article

Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos del NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire en Español para medir el Bienestar en combatientes de incendios forestales en México

Silvia G. León-Cortés, Esmeralda Alcaraz Sánchez, Raúl Flores Carrillo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Firefighting in forests is a dangerous and demanding task, highlighting the need to understand the well-being of these workers through tools such as the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire in Spanish. However, this questionnaire has not been adapted and validated for the Mexican context. Objective: The study aimed to validate the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire in Spanish for forest firefighters in Mexico. Methods: A psychometric design was used, including content validation through expert judgment in validation, health, and work activities related to firefighting. The questionnaire incorporates five domains with a Likert scale, and the Aiken's V coefficient was used for validation. Results: Most items in the questionnaire showed an Aiken's V coefficient above 0.70, with 95% confidence intervals, indicating high content validity. There was concordance with the original validation of the instrument, enabling its application in the Mexican work context. Conclusion: The expert validation confirmed the relevance, coherence, and clarity of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire in Spanish for forest firefighters in Mexico. This analysis is a critical component of a broader project, laying the groundwork for subsequent stages including a pilot test and factorial analysis, as well as contributing to improving the safety and quality of life of these workers.

Revista de la Facultad de Medicina HumanaVol. 24(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Stress and Burnout Research
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.