Similar Weaning Success Rate with High-Intensity and Sham Inspiratory Muscle Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMweanT)

<b>Rationale:</b> Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) improves respiratory muscle function in patients with weaning difficulties. IMT protocols involve performing daily sets of breaths against external loads. However, the impact of IMT on weaning outcomes while incorporating sham control interventions remains unclear. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the effects of a high-intensity IMT (Hi-IMT) intervention with a sham low-intensity (Lo-IMT) control group on weaning outcomes and respiratory muscle and pulmonary function 28 days after inclusion in patients with weaning difficulties. <b>Methods:</b> Both groups underwent daily IMT sessions until successful weaning or a maximum of 28 days. The Hi-IMT group (<i>n</i> = 44; 61% male; aged 57 ± 15 yr) performed maximal inspirations initiated from residual volume against an external load representing 30-50% of maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), and the control group (<i>n</i> = 46; 52% male; aged 60 ± 12 yr) performed maximal inspirations against a load ⩽10% PImax. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Training adherence (completed/planned sessions) was comparable between the groups (Hi-IMT, 77 ± 20%; Lo-IMT, 72 ± 17%; <i>P</i> = 0.25). Weaning success (64% Hi-IMT and 76% Lo-IMT; <i>P</i> = 0.43) and weaning duration (Hi-IMT, 45 ± 48 d; Lo-IMT, 37 ± 26 d; <i>P</i> = 0.33) were similar between groups. Both groups similarly improved PImax (Hi-IMT, +15 cm H<sub>2</sub>O [95% confidence interval (CI), 9, 20]; Lo-IMT, +14 cm H<sub>2</sub>O [95% CI, 9, 19]; <i>P</i> = 0.72). FVC improved more in the Hi-IMT group than in the Lo-IMT group (Hi-IMT, +0.33 L [95% CI, 0.22, 0.43]; Lo-IMT, +0.16 L [95% CI, 0.07, 0.25]; <i>P</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both high-intensity IMT and sham low-intensity IMT, with high adherence to the protocol, resulted in similar weaning success rates and pronounced improvements in maximal inspiratory muscle strength. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03240263).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202405-1042oc
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similar Weaning Success Rate with High-Intensity and Sham Inspiratory Muscle Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMweanT)

Daniël Langer, Marine Van Hollebeke, Mariana Hoffman, Rik Gosselink et al.
13 citations
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
5.45
article

Similar Weaning Success Rate with High-Intensity and Sham Inspiratory Muscle Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMweanT)

Daniël Langer, Marine Van Hollebeke, Mariana Hoffman, Rik Gosselink, Greet Hermans, Diego Poddighe, Zafeiris Louvaris, J. Müller, Béatrix Clerckx
article en
13 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) improves respiratory muscle function in patients with weaning difficulties. IMT protocols involve performing daily sets of breaths against external loads. However, the impact of IMT on weaning outcomes while incorporating sham control interventions remains unclear. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the effects of a high-intensity IMT (Hi-IMT) intervention with a sham low-intensity (Lo-IMT) control group on weaning outcomes and respiratory muscle and pulmonary function 28 days after inclusion in patients with weaning difficulties. <b>Methods:</b> Both groups underwent daily IMT sessions until successful weaning or a maximum of 28 days. The Hi-IMT group (<i>n</i> = 44; 61% male; aged 57 ± 15 yr) performed maximal inspirations initiated from residual volume against an external load representing 30-50% of maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), and the control group (<i>n</i> = 46; 52% male; aged 60 ± 12 yr) performed maximal inspirations against a load ⩽10% PImax. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Training adherence (completed/planned sessions) was comparable between the groups (Hi-IMT, 77 ± 20%; Lo-IMT, 72 ± 17%; <i>P</i> = 0.25). Weaning success (64% Hi-IMT and 76% Lo-IMT; <i>P</i> = 0.43) and weaning duration (Hi-IMT, 45 ± 48 d; Lo-IMT, 37 ± 26 d; <i>P</i> = 0.33) were similar between groups. Both groups similarly improved PImax (Hi-IMT, +15 cm H<sub>2</sub>O [95% confidence interval (CI), 9, 20]; Lo-IMT, +14 cm H<sub>2</sub>O [95% CI, 9, 19]; <i>P</i> = 0.72). FVC improved more in the Hi-IMT group than in the Lo-IMT group (Hi-IMT, +0.33 L [95% CI, 0.22, 0.43]; Lo-IMT, +0.16 L [95% CI, 0.07, 0.25]; <i>P</i> = 0.04). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both high-intensity IMT and sham low-intensity IMT, with high adherence to the protocol, resulted in similar weaning success rates and pronounced improvements in maximal inspiratory muscle strength. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03240263).

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineVol. 211(3)
Institute for Breathing and Sleep (AU), Centre for Movement Disorders (CA), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.