Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that alone weakly affect melanoma risk, but their combined effect on a polygenic risk score (PRS) can have a far bigger impact on estimating risk. However, the PRS is not yet at the stage of being utilized in clinical practice, and further evidence is needed. In this study, 270 melanoma patients fulfilling the criteria for a suspected genetic predisposition but with a negative genetic test for high/medium-penetrance genes were genotyped for 57 SNPs selected in previous GWASs to construct a PRS model. We found a significantly higher mean PRS<sub>57</sub> in all melanoma cases than in controls (0.58 vs. 0.00, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the mean PRS<sub>57</sub> in multiple primary melanoma cases was twice that in single melanoma cases (0.689 vs. 0.362, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Interestingly, our results confirm the association of the PRS<sub>57</sub> not only with other melanoma risk factors but also with a younger age at diagnosis. This evidence supports the potentially powerful discriminative role of PRS in the selection of high-risk patients who should undergo stricter surveillance protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13110954
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy

Stefania Pellegrini, Nienke van der Stoep, Mark M. Iles, Emily Tinsley et al.
1 citations
Biology
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
0.28
article

Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy

Stefania Pellegrini, Nienke van der Stoep, Mark M. Iles, Emily Tinsley, Chiara Menin, Thomas P. Potjer, Alessio Fabozzi, Antonella Vecchiato, Debora Tonello, Paola Del Bianco, Luisa Piccin, Maria Teresa Landi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that alone weakly affect melanoma risk, but their combined effect on a polygenic risk score (PRS) can have a far bigger impact on estimating risk. However, the PRS is not yet at the stage of being utilized in clinical practice, and further evidence is needed. In this study, 270 melanoma patients fulfilling the criteria for a suspected genetic predisposition but with a negative genetic test for high/medium-penetrance genes were genotyped for 57 SNPs selected in previous GWASs to construct a PRS model. We found a significantly higher mean PRS<sub>57</sub> in all melanoma cases than in controls (0.58 vs. 0.00, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the mean PRS<sub>57</sub> in multiple primary melanoma cases was twice that in single melanoma cases (0.689 vs. 0.362, <i>p</i> = 0.025). Interestingly, our results confirm the association of the PRS<sub>57</sub> not only with other melanoma risk factors but also with a younger age at diagnosis. This evidence supports the potentially powerful discriminative role of PRS in the selection of high-risk patients who should undergo stricter surveillance protocols.

BiologyVol. 13(11)
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), National Cancer Institute (US), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Ministero della Salute, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.