A Problems of Customs Penalties and Improvement Measures: Focusing on Cases

This study examines the disproportionate severity of current customs punishment regulations in comparison to penalties for foreign customs offenders, domestic tax offenders, and property evasion offenders. The analysis, grounded in the principles of responsibility, proportionality, and complementarity to criminal punishment, reveals significant issues within existing customs penalty regulations. The research concludes that reforms should aim to mitigate the current aggravated punishment approach. Key recommendations include: (1) elevating the monetary threshold for punishment under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Special Crimes and revising the calculation basis to ‘amount of customs tax evaded’ rather than ‘cost of goods’; (2) modifying regulations to adhere to the principle of punishment based on accomplice dependency; (3) amending the treatment of preliminary offenses to align with precedents in the Criminal Code and foreign customs penalties; and (4) harmonizing the punitive measures for customs offenders with those for tax offenders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29331/jkraic.2024.8.24.4.71
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Problems of Customs Penalties and Improvement Measures: Focusing on Cases

S. D. Lee, Ho-Joong Chang
Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce
Technology and Data Analysis
article

A Problems of Customs Penalties and Improvement Measures: Focusing on Cases

S. D. Lee, Ho-Joong Chang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the disproportionate severity of current customs punishment regulations in comparison to penalties for foreign customs offenders, domestic tax offenders, and property evasion offenders. The analysis, grounded in the principles of responsibility, proportionality, and complementarity to criminal punishment, reveals significant issues within existing customs penalty regulations. The research concludes that reforms should aim to mitigate the current aggravated punishment approach. Key recommendations include: (1) elevating the monetary threshold for punishment under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Special Crimes and revising the calculation basis to ‘amount of customs tax evaded’ rather than ‘cost of goods’; (2) modifying regulations to adhere to the principle of punishment based on accomplice dependency; (3) amending the treatment of preliminary offenses to align with precedents in the Criminal Code and foreign customs penalties; and (4) harmonizing the punitive measures for customs offenders with those for tax offenders.

Journal of Korea Research Association of International CommerceVol. 24(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Technology and Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Problems of Customs Penalties and Improvement Measures: Focusing on Cases — S. D. Lee, Ho-Joong Chang · Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS