Research goals for minimizing the cost of CO2 capture when using steam methane reforming for hydrogen production

This paper presents a techno-economic assessment of adding state-of-the-art solvent-based CO 2 capture technologies to greenfield steam methane reforming (SMR)-based H 2 production plants and quantifies the impacts of improvements in CO 2 capture technology. Current conventional capture technologies are reviewed, and future technologies in intermediate and long-term scenarios are analyzed. The results show that SMR plants fitted with high efficiency solvent-based capture technologies consume the same amount of natural gas as a conventional SMR plant without capture, despite capturing most of the CO 2 and producing the same amount of H 2 . Overall, improvements in reboiler duty and reductions in capital costs can significantly reduce the cost of H 2 production and cost of capture. Particularly, the reboiler duty of pre-combustion capture and the capital cost of post-combustion capture have the greatest impact. Based on the results, research goals are suggested. Solvent development is recommended—particularly pre-combustion solvents—for reducing the reboiler duties, and process schemes to reduce the capital costs. Costlier but more efficient solvents can be considered. A sensitivity analysis using natural gas price shows that technological improvements can reduce the impacts of high natural gas prices. The degree of economic feasibility of CO 2 capture increases with improvements to the capture technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100344
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research goals for minimizing the cost of CO2 capture when using steam methane reforming for hydrogen production

Mark Woods, Hari Mantripragada, Alexander Zoelle, Eric Lewis et al.
5 citations
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.06
article

Research goals for minimizing the cost of CO2 capture when using steam methane reforming for hydrogen production

Mark Woods, Hari Mantripragada, Alexander Zoelle, Eric Lewis, Travis Shultz, Rafael Carlos León, Eric Grol, Sally Homsy, Timothy Fout
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a techno-economic assessment of adding state-of-the-art solvent-based CO 2 capture technologies to greenfield steam methane reforming (SMR)-based H 2 production plants and quantifies the impacts of improvements in CO 2 capture technology. Current conventional capture technologies are reviewed, and future technologies in intermediate and long-term scenarios are analyzed. The results show that SMR plants fitted with high efficiency solvent-based capture technologies consume the same amount of natural gas as a conventional SMR plant without capture, despite capturing most of the CO 2 and producing the same amount of H 2 . Overall, improvements in reboiler duty and reductions in capital costs can significantly reduce the cost of H 2 production and cost of capture. Particularly, the reboiler duty of pre-combustion capture and the capital cost of post-combustion capture have the greatest impact. Based on the results, research goals are suggested. Solvent development is recommended—particularly pre-combustion solvents—for reducing the reboiler duties, and process schemes to reduce the capital costs. Costlier but more efficient solvents can be considered. A sensitivity analysis using natural gas price shows that technological improvements can reduce the impacts of high natural gas prices. The degree of economic feasibility of CO 2 capture increases with improvements to the capture technology.

Carbon Capture Science & TechnologyVol. 14
Defense Logistics Agency (US), Office of Nuclear Energy (US), West Virginia University Hospitals (US), National Energy Technology Laboratory (US), Office of Fossil Energy (US), Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management
U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.