Transhumanism and the American Political Myths

This paper engages with the discourse on transhumanism by critically examining its foundational elements, the political myths. Numerous critical perspectives have consistently emerged in pertinent to transhumanism. Critiques spanned a broad spectrum, from those advocating for a comprehensive and holistic examination of the philosophical arguments and claims posited by transhumanists, to more pragmatic voices focused on political and economic considerations, urging for limitations on the pursuits of high-tech industries that function within or are based on transhumanist principles. Nevertheless, these haste critiques are constrained by a fundamental misunderstanding of the geneaology of transhumanism: the deeper one probes its historical context to engage with it critically in the present, the more transhumanism becomes obscured, revealing only archaic ideas, Christian theological perspectives, and Enlightenment philosophy. Consequently, it is essential to regard the past as a discursive instrument that can be employed by modern transhumanist discourse, rather than simply as a sequence of chronological events. This paper explores the complex dimensions of transhumanism by analyzing its utilization and transformation of the political myths prevalent in twentieth-century United States, including the American way of life, comic-book superheroism, manifest destiny, and Christian eschatology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37123/th.2024.18.61
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transhumanism and the American Political Myths

Sokion Choi
Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Transhumanism and the American Political Myths

Sokion Choi
article en

Abstract

This paper engages with the discourse on transhumanism by critically examining its foundational elements, the political myths. Numerous critical perspectives have consistently emerged in pertinent to transhumanism. Critiques spanned a broad spectrum, from those advocating for a comprehensive and holistic examination of the philosophical arguments and claims posited by transhumanists, to more pragmatic voices focused on political and economic considerations, urging for limitations on the pursuits of high-tech industries that function within or are based on transhumanist principles. Nevertheless, these haste critiques are constrained by a fundamental misunderstanding of the geneaology of transhumanism: the deeper one probes its historical context to engage with it critically in the present, the more transhumanism becomes obscured, revealing only archaic ideas, Christian theological perspectives, and Enlightenment philosophy. Consequently, it is essential to regard the past as a discursive instrument that can be employed by modern transhumanist discourse, rather than simply as a sequence of chronological events. This paper explores the complex dimensions of transhumanism by analyzing its utilization and transformation of the political myths prevalent in twentieth-century United States, including the American way of life, comic-book superheroism, manifest destiny, and Christian eschatology.

Sookmyung Research Institute of HumanitiesVol. 18
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transhumanism and the American Political Myths — Sokion Choi · Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS