A Study on Process Method of Modal Adverbs in AI Translation : Focusing on Japanese-Korean Translation of Novels

The processing patterns of modal adverbs that appear in AI translation were examined by dividing them into Korean correspondence patterns and translation processing patterns. The results are as follows. First, in terms of Korean response, ‘もちろん/やはり/なぜ/まったく/まるで」’(Google and Papago) and ‘きっと/おそらく/たぶん’(Papago) show a one-on-one response to Korean at a rate of more than 90%. Particularly, ‘もちろん/まるで/まったく/やは り’(Google) and ‘なぜ/おそらく/たぶん/やはり’(Papago) are translated only to [물론/마치/전혀/역시] and [왜/아마(도)/아마(도)/역시], which means the overall semantic function is not subdivided and the diversity of expression is insufficient. Second, the world order change was the least, and the omission was the most common in terms of translation processing. The fixed adverbial position shows the weakening of the floating characteristic of the adverb, and the omissions show the adverbial feature as a secondary component. Subsequently, the misuse due to the confusion of the positive and negative usage methods of ‘まるで’, transformation due to the parts of speech transformation of ‘な ぜ’(Google) and ‘もちろん’(Papago), and meaning transformation of ‘きっと’ (Papago) can be seen. Misuse appears 36 on Google(1.86%) and 4 on Papago (0.20%), and transformation appears 1 on Google(0.05%) and 8 on Papago(0.41%). It shows flexibility partially with accuracy of machine translation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37123/th.2024.18.133
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Process Method of Modal Adverbs in AI Translation : Focusing on Japanese-Korean Translation of Novels

Mi‐Suk Park
Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

A Study on Process Method of Modal Adverbs in AI Translation : Focusing on Japanese-Korean Translation of Novels

Mi‐Suk Park
article en

Abstract

The processing patterns of modal adverbs that appear in AI translation were examined by dividing them into Korean correspondence patterns and translation processing patterns. The results are as follows. First, in terms of Korean response, ‘もちろん/やはり/なぜ/まったく/まるで」’(Google and Papago) and ‘きっと/おそらく/たぶん’(Papago) show a one-on-one response to Korean at a rate of more than 90%. Particularly, ‘もちろん/まるで/まったく/やは り’(Google) and ‘なぜ/おそらく/たぶん/やはり’(Papago) are translated only to [물론/마치/전혀/역시] and [왜/아마(도)/아마(도)/역시], which means the overall semantic function is not subdivided and the diversity of expression is insufficient. Second, the world order change was the least, and the omission was the most common in terms of translation processing. The fixed adverbial position shows the weakening of the floating characteristic of the adverb, and the omissions show the adverbial feature as a secondary component. Subsequently, the misuse due to the confusion of the positive and negative usage methods of ‘まるで’, transformation due to the parts of speech transformation of ‘な ぜ’(Google) and ‘もちろん’(Papago), and meaning transformation of ‘きっと’ (Papago) can be seen. Misuse appears 36 on Google(1.86%) and 4 on Papago (0.20%), and transformation appears 1 on Google(0.05%) and 8 on Papago(0.41%). It shows flexibility partially with accuracy of machine translation.

Sookmyung Research Institute of HumanitiesVol. 18
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.