Microfluidics chips fabrication techniques comparison

This study investigates various microfluidic chip fabrication techniques, highlighting their applicability and limitations in the context of urgent diagnostic needs showcased by the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a detailed examination of methods such as computer numerical control milling of a polymethyl methacrylate, soft lithography for polydimethylsiloxane-based devices, xurography for glass-glass chips, and micromachining-based silicon-glass chips, we analyze each technique's strengths and trade-offs. Hence, we discuss the fabrication complexity and chip thermal properties, such as heating and cooling rates, which are essential features of chip utilization for a polymerase chain reaction. Our comparative analysis reveals critical insights into material challenges, design flexibility, and cost-efficiency, aiming to guide the development of robust and reliable microfluidic devices for healthcare and research. This work underscores the importance of selecting appropriate fabrication methods to optimize device functionality, durability, and production efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80332-2
Citations
46
Primary Topic
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microfluidics chips fabrication techniques comparison

Pavel Neužil, Imrich Gablech, Jan Brodský, Ondřej Zítka et al.
46 citations
Scientific Reports
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
8.48
article

Microfluidics chips fabrication techniques comparison

Pavel Neužil, Imrich Gablech, Jan Brodský, Ondřej Zítka, Xiaocheng Liu, Tomáš Lednický, Petra Vopařilová, Wen Zeng, Antao Sun
article en
46 citations

Abstract

This study investigates various microfluidic chip fabrication techniques, highlighting their applicability and limitations in the context of urgent diagnostic needs showcased by the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a detailed examination of methods such as computer numerical control milling of a polymethyl methacrylate, soft lithography for polydimethylsiloxane-based devices, xurography for glass-glass chips, and micromachining-based silicon-glass chips, we analyze each technique's strengths and trade-offs. Hence, we discuss the fabrication complexity and chip thermal properties, such as heating and cooling rates, which are essential features of chip utilization for a polymerase chain reaction. Our comparative analysis reveals critical insights into material challenges, design flexibility, and cost-efficiency, aiming to guide the development of robust and reliable microfluidic devices for healthcare and research. This work underscores the importance of selecting appropriate fabrication methods to optimize device functionality, durability, and production efficiency.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Mendel University in Brno (CZ), Brno University of Technology (CZ)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, Mendelova Univerzita v Brně, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Biosensors and Analytical Detection
8.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.