Directional deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia: Outcomes, challenges and future directions

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Cervical dystonia is a movement disorder marked by involuntary head and neck muscle contractions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a recognised treatment, with directional DBS—enabling current steering—gaining traction in movement disorder management. <h3>Objective</h3> This study assessed clinical outcomes in cervical dystonia patients treated with directional DBS at our centre, compared to a matched group receiving conventional DBS, and examined challenges and research directions in directional DBS for dystonia. <h3>Methods</h3> Eleven patients with adult-onset isolated cervical dystonia received bilateral GPi stimulation with directional DBS systems, compared to a demographically matched cohort with conventional systems. Clinical outcomes and stimulation parameters were recorded at the latest follow-up, and electrode positioning was analysed using patient-specific volumes of tissue activated (VTA). <h3>Results</h3> Directional DBS significantly improved dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life (p < 0.001), with no significant differences versus conventional DBS. Five patients utilised at least one directional electrode; six were set to bilateral "ring-mode" stimulation. Group VTA for directional DBS was positioned more medial and anterior than ring-mode or conventional DBS. Side effects were less frequent in directional DBS (20 %) than in ring-mode (83 %) or conventional DBS (36 %). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Directional DBS showed efficacy comparable to conventional DBS in managing cervical dystonia, with fewer side effects. Despite these benefits, its application in dystonia remains limited compared to other movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, though advances in image-guided programming and biomarker discovery could support wider use in dystonia management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deep Brain Stimulation
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdbs.2024.11.002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Directional deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia: Outcomes, challenges and future directions

Ahmad Ali, Luke Andrews, Antonella Macerollo, Maneesh Bhojak et al.
1 citations
Deep Brain Stimulation
Neurological disorders and treatments
0.37
article

Directional deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia: Outcomes, challenges and future directions

Ahmad Ali, Luke Andrews, Antonella Macerollo, Maneesh Bhojak, Simon S. Keller, Jibril Osman‐Farah, Mohammed Elmolla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Cervical dystonia is a movement disorder marked by involuntary head and neck muscle contractions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is a recognised treatment, with directional DBS—enabling current steering—gaining traction in movement disorder management. <h3>Objective</h3> This study assessed clinical outcomes in cervical dystonia patients treated with directional DBS at our centre, compared to a matched group receiving conventional DBS, and examined challenges and research directions in directional DBS for dystonia. <h3>Methods</h3> Eleven patients with adult-onset isolated cervical dystonia received bilateral GPi stimulation with directional DBS systems, compared to a demographically matched cohort with conventional systems. Clinical outcomes and stimulation parameters were recorded at the latest follow-up, and electrode positioning was analysed using patient-specific volumes of tissue activated (VTA). <h3>Results</h3> Directional DBS significantly improved dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life (p < 0.001), with no significant differences versus conventional DBS. Five patients utilised at least one directional electrode; six were set to bilateral "ring-mode" stimulation. Group VTA for directional DBS was positioned more medial and anterior than ring-mode or conventional DBS. Side effects were less frequent in directional DBS (20 %) than in ring-mode (83 %) or conventional DBS (36 %). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Directional DBS showed efficacy comparable to conventional DBS in managing cervical dystonia, with fewer side effects. Despite these benefits, its application in dystonia remains limited compared to other movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, though advances in image-guided programming and biomarker discovery could support wider use in dystonia management.

Deep Brain StimulationVol. 7
University of Liverpool (GB), Cancer Research UK (GB), Walton Centre (GB)
Boston Scientific Corporation, Medical Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Neurological disorders and treatments
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.