Evaluating thermal comfort and air quality in buses with different ventilation strategies in Hong Kong

• Study impact of air supply velocities, directions and exhaust positions for buses. • Air supply velocity of 1.5 m/s balances bus's thermal comfort and air quality. • Changing air direction boosts comfort, altering exhaust position has minimal effect. • HVAC ensures uniform fresh air distribution when blowing air laterally. • Moving exhaust forward improve air quality in whole cabin, especially for driver. This study employed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to investigate the influence of air-conditioning exhaust position, supply velocity and direction on air quality and thermal comfort in a fully occupied bus. Air quality was evaluated employing CO 2 concentration as an indicator, while thermal comfort was assessed via the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) index. The findings reveal that air supply velocity and direction have significant impacts on passengers’ thermal comfort. In winter, a closed air supply can maintain thermal neutrality in the cabin (|PMV|<0.5). Increasing the supply velocity from 0.5 m/s to 3 m/s shifts head-level sensation from slightly cool (PMV<-0.5) to cold (PMV<-1.5). Adjusting the air supply direction to the left or right can effectively eliminate cool areas (PMV<-1) at the head level otherwise caused by the 1.5m/s downward airflow. Additionally, both the supply velocity and the exhaust position predominantly affect the air quality in the cabin. At a low velocity of 0.5 m/s, the average CO 2 concentration at the breathing level reaches 6670.79 PPM, far exceeding the health threshold of 3500 PPM set by the Hong Kong bus air quality standard. An increase in velocity to 1.5 m/s alleviates the average CO 2 levels to 2863.85 PPM within the healthy range. Furthermore, relocating the exhaust forward can further improve air quality by 4.10 %, reducing CO 2 concentration to 2746.50 PPM. Optimal conditions for air quality and thermal comfort are achieved with an air supply velocity of 1.5 m/s, a leftward direction, and the exhaust located at the middle of the ceiling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103449
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating thermal comfort and air quality in buses with different ventilation strategies in Hong Kong

Jia Wang, Peijing Rong, Hao Zhang, Weifeng Zhou
9 citations
Results in Engineering
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
11.69
article

Evaluating thermal comfort and air quality in buses with different ventilation strategies in Hong Kong

Jia Wang, Peijing Rong, Hao Zhang, Weifeng Zhou
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Study impact of air supply velocities, directions and exhaust positions for buses. • Air supply velocity of 1.5 m/s balances bus's thermal comfort and air quality. • Changing air direction boosts comfort, altering exhaust position has minimal effect. • HVAC ensures uniform fresh air distribution when blowing air laterally. • Moving exhaust forward improve air quality in whole cabin, especially for driver. This study employed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to investigate the influence of air-conditioning exhaust position, supply velocity and direction on air quality and thermal comfort in a fully occupied bus. Air quality was evaluated employing CO 2 concentration as an indicator, while thermal comfort was assessed via the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) index. The findings reveal that air supply velocity and direction have significant impacts on passengers’ thermal comfort. In winter, a closed air supply can maintain thermal neutrality in the cabin (|PMV|<0.5). Increasing the supply velocity from 0.5 m/s to 3 m/s shifts head-level sensation from slightly cool (PMV<-0.5) to cold (PMV<-1.5). Adjusting the air supply direction to the left or right can effectively eliminate cool areas (PMV<-1) at the head level otherwise caused by the 1.5m/s downward airflow. Additionally, both the supply velocity and the exhaust position predominantly affect the air quality in the cabin. At a low velocity of 0.5 m/s, the average CO 2 concentration at the breathing level reaches 6670.79 PPM, far exceeding the health threshold of 3500 PPM set by the Hong Kong bus air quality standard. An increase in velocity to 1.5 m/s alleviates the average CO 2 levels to 2863.85 PPM within the healthy range. Furthermore, relocating the exhaust forward can further improve air quality by 4.10 %, reducing CO 2 concentration to 2746.50 PPM. Optimal conditions for air quality and thermal comfort are achieved with an air supply velocity of 1.5 m/s, a leftward direction, and the exhaust located at the middle of the ceiling.

Results in EngineeringVol. 24
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
11.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.