Peer Feedback and its impact on university students’ writing performance
Introduction: This study addresses issues in students’ academic writing by proposing peer feedback as a strategy to improve university students’ advanced (B1 - B2) academic writing skills. The intervention took place over a sixteen-week course at a private university in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Method: An action research was conducted, integrating quantitative (pre- and post-tests) and qualitative (questionnaire) instruments to determine if sixty freshman university students would improve their writing skills in terms of structure, fluency, and accuracy. Results: Students demonstrated improvement in their writing, with a Cohen’s d = 0.39. Students’ feedback reported both benefits and challenges in providing peer feedback. Conclusions: Despite limitations for both students and the teacher, peer feedback can be considered a strategy to raise students’ awareness of their own writing errors at advanced level. Other EFL teachers and coordinators can gain new insights from this study.
Authors
- Fernando Intriago Cañizares (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-1801)
- María Rossana Ramírez-Ávila (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-2245)
Institutions
- Universidad Casa Grande (EC)
- Universidad de las Artes (EC)
Publication Details
- Journal
- AtoZ novas práticas em informação e conhecimento
- Published
- 2024-11-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v13i0.90734
- Primary Topic
- Student Assessment and Feedback
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00