Peer Feedback and its impact on university students’ writing performance

Introduction: This study addresses issues in students’ academic writing by proposing peer feedback as a strategy to improve university students’ advanced (B1 - B2) academic writing skills. The intervention took place over a sixteen-week course at a private university in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Method: An action research was conducted, integrating quantitative (pre- and post-tests) and qualitative (questionnaire) instruments to determine if sixty freshman university students would improve their writing skills in terms of structure, fluency, and accuracy. Results: Students demonstrated improvement in their writing, with a Cohen’s d = 0.39. Students’ feedback reported both benefits and challenges in providing peer feedback. Conclusions: Despite limitations for both students and the teacher, peer feedback can be considered a strategy to raise students’ awareness of their own writing errors at advanced level. Other EFL teachers and coordinators can gain new insights from this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AtoZ novas práticas em informação e conhecimento
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v13i0.90734
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer Feedback and its impact on university students’ writing performance

Fernando Intriago Cañizares, María Rossana Ramírez-Ávila
AtoZ novas práticas em informação e conhecimento
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Peer Feedback and its impact on university students’ writing performance

Fernando Intriago Cañizares, María Rossana Ramírez-Ávila
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study addresses issues in students’ academic writing by proposing peer feedback as a strategy to improve university students’ advanced (B1 - B2) academic writing skills. The intervention took place over a sixteen-week course at a private university in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Method: An action research was conducted, integrating quantitative (pre- and post-tests) and qualitative (questionnaire) instruments to determine if sixty freshman university students would improve their writing skills in terms of structure, fluency, and accuracy. Results: Students demonstrated improvement in their writing, with a Cohen’s d = 0.39. Students’ feedback reported both benefits and challenges in providing peer feedback. Conclusions: Despite limitations for both students and the teacher, peer feedback can be considered a strategy to raise students’ awareness of their own writing errors at advanced level. Other EFL teachers and coordinators can gain new insights from this study.

AtoZ novas práticas em informação e conhecimentoVol. 13
Universidad Casa Grande (EC), Universidad de las Artes (EC)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.