Adversarial Validation in Image Classification Datasets by Means of Cumulative Spectral Gradient

The main objective of a machine learning (ML) system is to obtain a trained model from input data in such a way that it allows predictions to be made on new i.i.d. (Independently and Identically Distributed) data with the lowest possible error. However, how can we assess whether the training and test data have a similar distribution? To answer this question, this paper presents a proposal to determine the degree of distribution shift of two datasets. To this end, a metric for evaluating complexity in datasets is used, which can be applied in multi-class problems, comparing each pair of classes of the two sets. The proposed methodology has been applied to three well-known datasets: MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, together with corrupted versions of these. Through this methodology, it is possible to evaluate which types of modification have a greater impact on the generalization of the models without the need to train multiple models multiple times, also allowing us to determine which classes are more affected by corruption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a17110531
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adversarial Validation in Image Classification Datasets by Means of Cumulative Spectral Gradient

Adrian Chavarro, Ernesto Moya-Albor, Diego Renza
2 citations
Algorithms
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
0.69
article

Adversarial Validation in Image Classification Datasets by Means of Cumulative Spectral Gradient

Adrian Chavarro, Ernesto Moya-Albor, Diego Renza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The main objective of a machine learning (ML) system is to obtain a trained model from input data in such a way that it allows predictions to be made on new i.i.d. (Independently and Identically Distributed) data with the lowest possible error. However, how can we assess whether the training and test data have a similar distribution? To answer this question, this paper presents a proposal to determine the degree of distribution shift of two datasets. To this end, a metric for evaluating complexity in datasets is used, which can be applied in multi-class problems, comparing each pair of classes of the two sets. The proposed methodology has been applied to three well-known datasets: MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, together with corrupted versions of these. Through this methodology, it is possible to evaluate which types of modification have a greater impact on the generalization of the models without the need to train multiple models multiple times, also allowing us to determine which classes are more affected by corruption.

AlgorithmsVol. 17(11)
Military University Nueva Granada (CO), Universidad Panamericana (MX)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adversarial Validation in Image Classification Datasets by Means of Cumulative Spectral Gradient — Adrian Chavarro, Ernesto Moya-Albor, et al. · Algorithms (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS