Repetition increases belief in implausible statements more than for plausible statements

The finding that repetition causes increased belief - termed the illusory truth effect - has raised important concerns about the possibility of repetition leading to widespread belief in falsehoods. This concern implies that the illusory truth effect meaningfully impacts statements that are initially thought to be implausible, as is commonly the case for falsehoods. Using a large (N = 933) online experiment, we test the relationship between the illusory truth effect and prior belief in trivia statements. In contrast to previous work, we measure the prior belief that an individual assigns to a specific statement to allow for a precise estimation of this relationship. Concerningly, we find that not only does the illusory truth effect appear meaningful for statements where participants have low prior belief, but the effect is actually stronger for these initially implausible statements. Our findings suggest that repetition can be particularly harmful when statements are initially seen as implausible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106780
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Repetition increases belief in implausible statements more than for plausible statements

Reed Orchinik, Gordon Pennycook, Lisa K. Fazio, David Gertler Rand
1 links
Cognition
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Repetition increases belief in implausible statements more than for plausible statements

Reed Orchinik, Gordon Pennycook, Lisa K. Fazio, David Gertler Rand
article en

Abstract

The finding that repetition causes increased belief - termed the illusory truth effect - has raised important concerns about the possibility of repetition leading to widespread belief in falsehoods. This concern implies that the illusory truth effect meaningfully impacts statements that are initially thought to be implausible, as is commonly the case for falsehoods. Using a large (N = 933) online experiment, we test the relationship between the illusory truth effect and prior belief in trivia statements. In contrast to previous work, we measure the prior belief that an individual assigns to a specific statement to allow for a precise estimation of this relationship. Concerningly, we find that not only does the illusory truth effect appear meaningful for statements where participants have low prior belief, but the effect is actually stronger for these initially implausible statements. Our findings suggest that repetition can be particularly harmful when statements are initially seen as implausible.

CognitionVol. 279
Vanderbilt University (US), Cornell University (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
National Science Foundation, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon