Influence of Coal Stress Sensitivity on the Desorption Production Characteristics and Residual CH<sub>4</sub> Distribution of Thin Multilayered Coal Seams

Multilayer codevelopment technology can significantly enhance the efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) production in multilayer thin coal seams. When facing multiple coal seams with low permeability and large differences in permeability between layers, investigating the impact of permeability and its stress sensitivity on the desorption and production patterns of methane (CH4) is fundamental to the implementation of multilayer codevelopment techniques. Permeability stress sensitivity tests on coal cores, CH4 desorption production experiments, and quantitative analysis of CH4 distribution in coal were conducted on coal samples with varying permeabilities in order to identify an optimal pressure drawdown approach that mitigates the adverse effects of permeability differences on multilayer codevelopment. Experimental findings indicate that a significant shift in permeability ratios among coal seams is observed, from 1:18.9:5.4 to 1:43.1:10.8, which exacerbates interlayer differences, which occurs as reservoir pressure decreases to the abandonment. The linear pressure decline method is found to be effective in enhancing CH4 recovery, particularly in low-permeability coal, with a high recovery rate of 71.6%. This method outperforms both stepwise and direct pressure decline methods, which achieve recovery rates of 67.5% and 54.7%, respectively. The study also reveals that high-permeability coal exhibits 4.8–9.5% higher CH4 recovery rates than that of low-permeability coal with a linear decrease in pressure. The high-permeability coal also reaches the peak CH4 production rate earlier and maintains it for a longer period. The higher adsorbed CH4 recovery rates and more uniform distribution of residual adsorbed CH4 in high-permeability coal suggest that CH4 in micropores is more readily desorbed. The study underscores the importance of reasonable bottom hole flowing pressure control for optimizing multilayer codevelopment and provides a scientific basis for the effective development of CBM in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03872
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Coal Stress Sensitivity on the Desorption Production Characteristics and Residual CH4 Distribution of Thin Multilayered Coal Seams

Piroska Lorinczi, S. Zheng, Jianlong Xiong, Paul Glover et al.
2 citations
Energy & Fuels
Coal Properties and Utilization
0.67
article

Influence of Coal Stress Sensitivity on the Desorption Production Characteristics and Residual CH4 Distribution of Thin Multilayered Coal Seams

Piroska Lorinczi, S. Zheng, Jianlong Xiong, Paul Glover, Qian Wang, Jian Shen, Jun Zhang, Zhang Zhi-jun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Multilayer codevelopment technology can significantly enhance the efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) production in multilayer thin coal seams. When facing multiple coal seams with low permeability and large differences in permeability between layers, investigating the impact of permeability and its stress sensitivity on the desorption and production patterns of methane (CH4) is fundamental to the implementation of multilayer codevelopment techniques. Permeability stress sensitivity tests on coal cores, CH4 desorption production experiments, and quantitative analysis of CH4 distribution in coal were conducted on coal samples with varying permeabilities in order to identify an optimal pressure drawdown approach that mitigates the adverse effects of permeability differences on multilayer codevelopment. Experimental findings indicate that a significant shift in permeability ratios among coal seams is observed, from 1:18.9:5.4 to 1:43.1:10.8, which exacerbates interlayer differences, which occurs as reservoir pressure decreases to the abandonment. The linear pressure decline method is found to be effective in enhancing CH4 recovery, particularly in low-permeability coal, with a high recovery rate of 71.6%. This method outperforms both stepwise and direct pressure decline methods, which achieve recovery rates of 67.5% and 54.7%, respectively. The study also reveals that high-permeability coal exhibits 4.8–9.5% higher CH4 recovery rates than that of low-permeability coal with a linear decrease in pressure. The high-permeability coal also reaches the peak CH4 production rate earlier and maintains it for a longer period. The higher adsorbed CH4 recovery rates and more uniform distribution of residual adsorbed CH4 in high-permeability coal suggest that CH4 in micropores is more readily desorbed. The study underscores the importance of reasonable bottom hole flowing pressure control for optimizing multilayer codevelopment and provides a scientific basis for the effective development of CBM in the region.

Energy & FuelsVol. 38(23)
University of Leeds (GB), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Ministry of Education (SA), Gansu Coalfield Geology Bureau (CN), Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Coal Properties and Utilization
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.