Dynamics of recovery in psychosis, stigmatization, and microaggressions in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of service users’ narratives

Collaborative care relationships form a key component of recovery-oriented mental healthcare, but can be disrupted if service users feel judged by professionals. Professionals can express stigmatizing attitudes through microaggressions, i.e. subtle forms of discrimination that have a negative cumulative effect. People with psychosis have been found to regularly experience overt and subtle forms of stigma in mental healthcare. This study aims to expand our understanding of the various forms and consequences of microaggression from a service user perspective. In this qualitative study, we analysed narratives of people with psychosis purposefully selected from two collections of Dutch patient-authored stories (‘Verhalenbank psychiatrie’ and ‘Patientervaringsverhalen’), including two books and nine transcripts of low-structured interviews. We performed thematic analysis to identify different forms of microaggression and additionally used narrative analysis to gain insight into the experienced consequences for recovery. We identified three main forms of microaggression: microaggressions that dehumanize; microaggressions that disregard service users’ perspectives; and microaggressions that convey hopelessness. Experienced consequences of microaggression included feelings of loneliness, powerlessness and uselessness, acts of despair, resistance or withdrawal, and disengagement from services. Microaggressions were found to create additional recovery needs that were often addressed outside mental healthcare. Our findings illustrate the gap between ideals concerning collaborative care relationships and the everyday experiences of service users. Service users often experienced an absence of relationship-building in mental healthcare, with negative consequences for their recovery process. Our identification of different forms of microaggression can raise awareness and effectuate behavioural change in professionals and contribute to the emancipation of people with psychosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06262-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of recovery in psychosis, stigmatization, and microaggressions in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of service users’ narratives

Nienke van Sambeek, Marjolijn Heerings, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Floortje Scheepers et al.
5 citations
BMC Psychiatry
Mental Health Treatment and Access
3.22
article

Dynamics of recovery in psychosis, stigmatization, and microaggressions in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of service users’ narratives

Nienke van Sambeek, Marjolijn Heerings, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Floortje Scheepers, Ploon Defourny
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Collaborative care relationships form a key component of recovery-oriented mental healthcare, but can be disrupted if service users feel judged by professionals. Professionals can express stigmatizing attitudes through microaggressions, i.e. subtle forms of discrimination that have a negative cumulative effect. People with psychosis have been found to regularly experience overt and subtle forms of stigma in mental healthcare. This study aims to expand our understanding of the various forms and consequences of microaggression from a service user perspective. In this qualitative study, we analysed narratives of people with psychosis purposefully selected from two collections of Dutch patient-authored stories (‘Verhalenbank psychiatrie’ and ‘Patientervaringsverhalen’), including two books and nine transcripts of low-structured interviews. We performed thematic analysis to identify different forms of microaggression and additionally used narrative analysis to gain insight into the experienced consequences for recovery. We identified three main forms of microaggression: microaggressions that dehumanize; microaggressions that disregard service users’ perspectives; and microaggressions that convey hopelessness. Experienced consequences of microaggression included feelings of loneliness, powerlessness and uselessness, acts of despair, resistance or withdrawal, and disengagement from services. Microaggressions were found to create additional recovery needs that were often addressed outside mental healthcare. Our findings illustrate the gap between ideals concerning collaborative care relationships and the everyday experiences of service users. Service users often experienced an absence of relationship-building in mental healthcare, with negative consequences for their recovery process. Our identification of different forms of microaggression can raise awareness and effectuate behavioural change in professionals and contribute to the emancipation of people with psychosis.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 24(1)
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.