Fracture in Association with Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with CKD and Atrial Fibrillation

Key Points In patients with CKD and atrial fibrillation, we observed no difference in the rates of fracture between initiators of direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin. However, direct oral anticoagulant use relative to warfarin was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Background Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has been associated with a lower risk of adverse events relative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Little is known about the risk of fracture in association with anticoagulant therapy in patients with CKD. Methods We conducted a new user, active comparator cohort study in a United States-based commercial claims database spanning 2013 through 2020 to quantify the comparative risk of fracture associated with select DOACs (apixaban or rivaroxaban) versus warfarin. Individuals were required to have International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes for CKD (stages 3–5) and atrial fibrillation during the 365-day baseline period before anticoagulant initiation. Primary analyses quantified nonvertebral fracture risk between patients initiating DOACs and warfarin using a 1:1 propensity score-matched design. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of nonvertebral fracture. Secondary analyses evaluated risks of hip fracture and all-cause mortality. Results The 1:1 propensity score-matched population included 14,370 DOAC initiators and 14,370 warfarin initiators. The mean age at anticoagulant initiation was 77 years, and 45% were female. The HR for nonvertebral fracture comparing DOACs with warfarin was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.32), and the corresponding incidence rate difference per 1000 person-years was 3.55 (95% CI, −1.67 to 8.76). The HR and incidence rate difference comparing DOACs with warfarin were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.41) and −0.13 (95% CI, −2.52 to 2.25), respectively, for hip fracture and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98) and −17.23 (95% CI, −29.49 to −4.96), respectively, for all-cause mortality. Conclusions In patients with CKD and atrial fibrillation, we did not observe a difference in the rates of fracture between DOAC and warfarin initiators. DOAC use relative to warfarin was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2025_01_23_CJASN_Jan2011232025.mp3

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000578
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture in Association with Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with CKD and Atrial Fibrillation

Nazleen F. Khan, Su Been Lee, Katsiaryna Bykov, Julie M. Paik et al.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Fracture in Association with Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with CKD and Atrial Fibrillation

Nazleen F. Khan, Su Been Lee, Katsiaryna Bykov, Julie M. Paik, Seoyoung C. Kim
article en

Abstract

Key Points In patients with CKD and atrial fibrillation, we observed no difference in the rates of fracture between initiators of direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin. However, direct oral anticoagulant use relative to warfarin was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Background Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has been associated with a lower risk of adverse events relative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Little is known about the risk of fracture in association with anticoagulant therapy in patients with CKD. Methods We conducted a new user, active comparator cohort study in a United States-based commercial claims database spanning 2013 through 2020 to quantify the comparative risk of fracture associated with select DOACs (apixaban or rivaroxaban) versus warfarin. Individuals were required to have International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes for CKD (stages 3–5) and atrial fibrillation during the 365-day baseline period before anticoagulant initiation. Primary analyses quantified nonvertebral fracture risk between patients initiating DOACs and warfarin using a 1:1 propensity score-matched design. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of nonvertebral fracture. Secondary analyses evaluated risks of hip fracture and all-cause mortality. Results The 1:1 propensity score-matched population included 14,370 DOAC initiators and 14,370 warfarin initiators. The mean age at anticoagulant initiation was 77 years, and 45% were female. The HR for nonvertebral fracture comparing DOACs with warfarin was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.32), and the corresponding incidence rate difference per 1000 person-years was 3.55 (95% CI, −1.67 to 8.76). The HR and incidence rate difference comparing DOACs with warfarin were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.41) and −0.13 (95% CI, −2.52 to 2.25), respectively, for hip fracture and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98) and −17.23 (95% CI, −29.49 to −4.96), respectively, for all-cause mortality. Conclusions In patients with CKD and atrial fibrillation, we did not observe a difference in the rates of fracture between DOAC and warfarin initiators. DOAC use relative to warfarin was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2025_01_23_CJASN_Jan2011232025.mp3

Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 20(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.