Assessing adversarial replay and deep learning-driven attacks on specific emitter identification-based security approaches

Specific Emitter Identification (SEI) has been put forward as an Internet of Things (IoT) Physical Layer Security (PLS) approach for its abilities to detect, characterize, and identify wireless emitters by exploiting distinct, inherent, and unintentional features in their transmitted signals. Since its introduction, a significant amount of work has been conducted; however, most assume the emitters are passive and their identifying signal features are immutable and challenging to mimic. This suggests the emitters are reluctant and incapable of developing and implementing effective SEI countermeasures; however, Deep Learning (DL) has been shown capable of learning emitter-specific features directly from their raw in-phase and quadrature signal samples, while Software-Defined Radios (SDRs) are capable of manipulating these signal samples. Based on these capabilities, it is fair to question the ease at which an emitter can effectively mimic the SEI features of another or manipulate its own to hinder or defeat SEI. This work considers SEI mimicry using three signal features mimicking countermeasures; “off-the-self” DL; two SDRs of different sizes, weights, power, and cost (SWaP-C); handcrafted and DL-based SEI processes, and assessment of an SEI mimicry countermeasure in a “coffee shop” deployment. Our results show “off-the-shelf” DL algorithms, and SDR enables SEI mimicry; however, adversary success is hindered by: (i) the use of decoy emitter preambles, (ii) the use of a denoising autoencoder and (iii) SDR SWaP-C constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Internet of Things
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-024-00077-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing adversarial replay and deep learning-driven attacks on specific emitter identification-based security approaches

Mohamed K. M. Fadul, T. Daniel Loveless, Donald R. Reising, Joshua H. Tyler et al.
2 citations
Discover Internet of Things
Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
0.69
article

Assessing adversarial replay and deep learning-driven attacks on specific emitter identification-based security approaches

Mohamed K. M. Fadul, T. Daniel Loveless, Donald R. Reising, Joshua H. Tyler, Matthew R. Hilling
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Specific Emitter Identification (SEI) has been put forward as an Internet of Things (IoT) Physical Layer Security (PLS) approach for its abilities to detect, characterize, and identify wireless emitters by exploiting distinct, inherent, and unintentional features in their transmitted signals. Since its introduction, a significant amount of work has been conducted; however, most assume the emitters are passive and their identifying signal features are immutable and challenging to mimic. This suggests the emitters are reluctant and incapable of developing and implementing effective SEI countermeasures; however, Deep Learning (DL) has been shown capable of learning emitter-specific features directly from their raw in-phase and quadrature signal samples, while Software-Defined Radios (SDRs) are capable of manipulating these signal samples. Based on these capabilities, it is fair to question the ease at which an emitter can effectively mimic the SEI features of another or manipulate its own to hinder or defeat SEI. This work considers SEI mimicry using three signal features mimicking countermeasures; “off-the-self” DL; two SDRs of different sizes, weights, power, and cost (SWaP-C); handcrafted and DL-based SEI processes, and assessment of an SEI mimicry countermeasure in a “coffee shop” deployment. Our results show “off-the-shelf” DL algorithms, and SDR enables SEI mimicry; however, adversary success is hindered by: (i) the use of decoy emitter preambles, (ii) the use of a denoising autoencoder and (iii) SDR SWaP-C constraints.

Discover Internet of ThingsVol. 4(1)
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Tennessee Technological University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing adversarial replay and deep learning-driven attacks on specific emitter identification-based security approaches — Mohamed K. M. Fadul, T. Daniel Loveless, et al. · Discover Internet of Things (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS