Impacts of climate litigation on firm value

Abstract Communities and individuals are turning to courts to hold governments and high-emitting firms to account for the adverse consequences of climate change. Such litigation is part of a broader trend in which stakeholders are increasingly scrutinizing firms for their sustainability practices. For firms, rising climate litigation risk may exacerbate wider sustainability risks. Here we construct a comprehensive database of filings and decisions relating to 108 climate lawsuits against US- and European-listed firms between 2005 and 2021. We show that firms experience, on average, a 0.41% fall in stock returns following a climate-related filing or an unfavourable court decision. Cases filed against Carbon Majors, primarily the world’s largest fossil fuel producers, saw the largest stock market responses, with returns reducing by 0.57% and 1.50% following filings and unfavourable decisions, respectively. Markets respond more to ‘novel’ climate litigation involving new legal arguments or jurisdictions. Our findings suggest that climate litigation provides a way for stakeholders to challenge actual and perceived weaknesses in the sustainability practices of firms. We conclude that financial markets consider such litigation to be a relevant financial risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Sustainability
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01455-y
Citations
48
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of climate litigation on firm value

Frank Venmans, Joana Setzer, Glen Gostlow, Catherine Higham et al.
48 citations
Nature Sustainability
Corporate Law and Human Rights
30.35
article

Impacts of climate litigation on firm value

Frank Venmans, Joana Setzer, Glen Gostlow, Catherine Higham, Misato Sato
article en
48 citations

Abstract

Abstract Communities and individuals are turning to courts to hold governments and high-emitting firms to account for the adverse consequences of climate change. Such litigation is part of a broader trend in which stakeholders are increasingly scrutinizing firms for their sustainability practices. For firms, rising climate litigation risk may exacerbate wider sustainability risks. Here we construct a comprehensive database of filings and decisions relating to 108 climate lawsuits against US- and European-listed firms between 2005 and 2021. We show that firms experience, on average, a 0.41% fall in stock returns following a climate-related filing or an unfavourable court decision. Cases filed against Carbon Majors, primarily the world’s largest fossil fuel producers, saw the largest stock market responses, with returns reducing by 0.57% and 1.50% following filings and unfavourable decisions, respectively. Markets respond more to ‘novel’ climate litigation involving new legal arguments or jurisdictions. Our findings suggest that climate litigation provides a way for stakeholders to challenge actual and perceived weaknesses in the sustainability practices of firms. We conclude that financial markets consider such litigation to be a relevant financial risk.

Nature SustainabilityVol. 7(11)
University of Zurich (CH), Swiss Finance Institute (CH), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
National Science Foundation, London School of Economics and Political Science, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, University of Leeds, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Economic and Social Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
30.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.