Investigating learner characteristics and processes in Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure to design adaptive guidance

We investigate learner characteristics and learning processes in two instructional designs with preparatory activities prior to instruction: Productive Failure (PF) and Vicarious Failure (VF). The aim is to develop a first theoretical understanding of PF and VF learners that can inform directions for the design of adaptive support. Based on an experimental study with 110 secondary school students in mathematics, we examine the effect of students’ learner characteristics in PF (students generating own solution attempts) and VF (students studying these attempts). We assess the learning processes based on think-aloud data from 15 PF-VF-model-observer-pairs, analyzing frequencies and sequences of cognitive processes, using the HeuristicsMiner algorithm. Mathematical ability was related to PF and VF students' learning, prior knowledge and mathematical self-concept to their learning processes. While both groups showed large overlaps in the frequencies and sequences of learning processes, VF students displayed a more analytical and PF students a more solution-oriented approach to the task. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior was relevant for VF students’ learning, depending on prior knowledge and ability. For PF students, it depended on mathematical self-concept. PF and VF students’ learning as well as frequencies and sequences of their learning processes relates to cognitive and affective learner characteristics. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior may require adaptive guidance specifically for learners with low mathematical self-concept in PF or prior knowledge and ability in VF. • Productive Failure (PF) and Vicarious Failure (VF) activities are comparable. • PF students approach the task solution-oriented, VF students analytically. • Metacognitive planning and evaluation are relevant learning processes. • Low self-concept, low prior knowledge and ability learners may require support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102052
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating learner characteristics and processes in Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure to design adaptive guidance

Charleen Brand, Christian Hartmann, Katharina Loibl, Nikol Rummel
6 citations
Learning and Instruction
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.08
article

Investigating learner characteristics and processes in Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure to design adaptive guidance

Charleen Brand, Christian Hartmann, Katharina Loibl, Nikol Rummel
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We investigate learner characteristics and learning processes in two instructional designs with preparatory activities prior to instruction: Productive Failure (PF) and Vicarious Failure (VF). The aim is to develop a first theoretical understanding of PF and VF learners that can inform directions for the design of adaptive support. Based on an experimental study with 110 secondary school students in mathematics, we examine the effect of students’ learner characteristics in PF (students generating own solution attempts) and VF (students studying these attempts). We assess the learning processes based on think-aloud data from 15 PF-VF-model-observer-pairs, analyzing frequencies and sequences of cognitive processes, using the HeuristicsMiner algorithm. Mathematical ability was related to PF and VF students' learning, prior knowledge and mathematical self-concept to their learning processes. While both groups showed large overlaps in the frequencies and sequences of learning processes, VF students displayed a more analytical and PF students a more solution-oriented approach to the task. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior was relevant for VF students’ learning, depending on prior knowledge and ability. For PF students, it depended on mathematical self-concept. PF and VF students’ learning as well as frequencies and sequences of their learning processes relates to cognitive and affective learner characteristics. Metacognitive planning and evaluation behavior may require adaptive guidance specifically for learners with low mathematical self-concept in PF or prior knowledge and ability in VF. • Productive Failure (PF) and Vicarious Failure (VF) activities are comparable. • PF students approach the task solution-oriented, VF students analytically. • Metacognitive planning and evaluation are relevant learning processes. • Low self-concept, low prior knowledge and ability learners may require support.

Learning and InstructionVol. 95
University of Education Freiburg (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.