Transfer of Rapport in a Simulated Investigative Interview

ABSTRACT Recent research into effective investigative interviewing practice has focused on the benefits of interviewer‐interviewee rapport to successful outcomes. However, little research has addressed whether rapport developed between the interviewee and other law enforcement interactants can be transferred to the interviewer‐interviewee relationship. In the current study, 121 college students participated in an interview about their participation in potentially embarrassing illegal or unethical behaviours after having interacted with an experimenter. Participants were randomly assigned to either a rapport‐building experimenter or a neutral experimenter and to either a rapport‐building interviewer or a neutral interviewer. Although interaction with a rapport‐building experimenter did not directly increase perceptions of rapport with the interviewer, across interviewer rapport‐building conditions, it did indirectly affect perceptions of rapport with the interviewer, through perceptions of rapport with the experimenter. Additionally, perceptions of rapport with a rapport‐building interviewer were higher when the experimenter also tried to build rapport. Perceptions of rapport with the experimenter were greater when the interviewer built rapport. These results have implications for strategic use of rapport‐building behaviours among multiple interviewees and for officers who have initial contact with potential interviewees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1644
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transfer of Rapport in a Simulated Investigative Interview

Misty C. Duke
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Transfer of Rapport in a Simulated Investigative Interview

Misty C. Duke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent research into effective investigative interviewing practice has focused on the benefits of interviewer‐interviewee rapport to successful outcomes. However, little research has addressed whether rapport developed between the interviewee and other law enforcement interactants can be transferred to the interviewer‐interviewee relationship. In the current study, 121 college students participated in an interview about their participation in potentially embarrassing illegal or unethical behaviours after having interacted with an experimenter. Participants were randomly assigned to either a rapport‐building experimenter or a neutral experimenter and to either a rapport‐building interviewer or a neutral interviewer. Although interaction with a rapport‐building experimenter did not directly increase perceptions of rapport with the interviewer, across interviewer rapport‐building conditions, it did indirectly affect perceptions of rapport with the interviewer, through perceptions of rapport with the experimenter. Additionally, perceptions of rapport with a rapport‐building interviewer were higher when the experimenter also tried to build rapport. Perceptions of rapport with the experimenter were greater when the interviewer built rapport. These results have implications for strategic use of rapport‐building behaviours among multiple interviewees and for officers who have initial contact with potential interviewees.

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender ProfilingVol. 22(1)
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
University Research Institute, University of Texas at El Paso
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.