Comparative Analysis of FaceNet and ArcFace in Minimizing False Positives for Enhanced Access Control Security

Face recognition technology is crucial for enhancing security in access control systems, yet false positives remain a significant challenge. This paper compares two leading pre-trained face recognition models, FaceNet and ArcFace, to determine which model better minimizes false positives in access control scenarios. The study involves testing the models under various real-world conditions, including different distances, lighting levels, and the presence of multiple subjects, to simulate actual operational environments. Experiments using live stream video from a standard laptop webcam with subjects not included in the training dataset assessed each model's ability to accurately recognize unfamiliar faces. The results indicate that FaceNet outperforms ArcFace in real-world conditions, exhibiting lower false positive rates across varying distances and lighting conditions, while ArcFace shows consistent performance in multiple person detection, suggesting reliability in controlled settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciss62896.2024.10750931
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of FaceNet and ArcFace in Minimizing False Positives for Enhanced Access Control Security

Ulva Elviani, Fadhil Hidayat, Figo Agil Alunjati, Ray Clement Juwanda
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

Comparative Analysis of FaceNet and ArcFace in Minimizing False Positives for Enhanced Access Control Security

Ulva Elviani, Fadhil Hidayat, Figo Agil Alunjati, Ray Clement Juwanda
article en

Abstract

Face recognition technology is crucial for enhancing security in access control systems, yet false positives remain a significant challenge. This paper compares two leading pre-trained face recognition models, FaceNet and ArcFace, to determine which model better minimizes false positives in access control scenarios. The study involves testing the models under various real-world conditions, including different distances, lighting levels, and the presence of multiple subjects, to simulate actual operational environments. Experiments using live stream video from a standard laptop webcam with subjects not included in the training dataset assessed each model's ability to accurately recognize unfamiliar faces. The results indicate that FaceNet outperforms ArcFace in real-world conditions, exhibiting lower false positive rates across varying distances and lighting conditions, while ArcFace shows consistent performance in multiple person detection, suggesting reliability in controlled settings.

Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.