Evaluating the Performance of Different Text Detection and Recognition Models for Tyre Text

Computer Vision is a large part of artificial intel-ligence, specifically Optical Character Recognition. OCR helps by processing text and letters into digital content. One use case where Text recognition is not significant is tyre text. One challenge for the tyre text is the contrast between the text and its background. Using pre-trained text region detection and recognition models, this paper aims to recognize text using several models. Textsnake and CRAFT are used for text region detection, while ABINet, ASTER, and MORANv2 are used for text recognition. Results show Textsnake and ABINet to be the best. It was found that CRAFT had more correct detections by 5% on raw images and 1% on preprocessed images, but Textsnake was better for phrases and finding regions. As for Text recognition, it was observed that ABINet is better overall, with an accuracy of 40%, whilst ASTER is at 33%. Despite MORANv2 being the fastest by 25x, it was very inaccurate. In the end, using Textsnake and ABINet is the best out of all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciss62896.2024.10751018
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Performance of Different Text Detection and Recognition Models for Tyre Text

Nunung Nurul Qomariyah, Veronica Lestari Jauw, Jayson Mikael Hendra, Peter Nelson Subrata
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
article

Evaluating the Performance of Different Text Detection and Recognition Models for Tyre Text

Nunung Nurul Qomariyah, Veronica Lestari Jauw, Jayson Mikael Hendra, Peter Nelson Subrata
article en

Abstract

Computer Vision is a large part of artificial intel-ligence, specifically Optical Character Recognition. OCR helps by processing text and letters into digital content. One use case where Text recognition is not significant is tyre text. One challenge for the tyre text is the contrast between the text and its background. Using pre-trained text region detection and recognition models, this paper aims to recognize text using several models. Textsnake and CRAFT are used for text region detection, while ABINet, ASTER, and MORANv2 are used for text recognition. Results show Textsnake and ABINet to be the best. It was found that CRAFT had more correct detections by 5% on raw images and 1% on preprocessed images, but Textsnake was better for phrases and finding regions. As for Text recognition, it was observed that ABINet is better overall, with an accuracy of 40%, whilst ASTER is at 33%. Despite MORANv2 being the fastest by 25x, it was very inaccurate. In the end, using Textsnake and ABINet is the best out of all.

University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (MY), Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.