Recurring tidal disruption events a decade apart in IRAS F01004-2237

Context. In theory, recurring tidal disruption events (TDEs) may occur when a close stellar binary encounters a supermassive black hole, if one star is captured and undergoes repeating partial TDEs, or if both stars are tidally disrupted (double TDEs). In addition, independent TDEs may be observed over decades in some special galaxies where the TDE rate is extremely high. Exploring the diversity of recurring TDEs and probing their natures with rich observational data helps us to understand these mechanisms. Aims. We report the discovery of a second optical flare that occurred in September 2021 in IRAS F01004-2237, where a first flare that occurred in 2010 had already been reported. We also present a detailed analysis of multi-band data. We aim to understand the nature of the flare and explore the possible causes of the recurring flares. Methods. We describe our analysis of the position of the flare, the multi-band light curves (LCs), the optical and ultraviolet (UV) spectra, and the X-ray LC and spectra. Results. The position of the flare coincides with the galaxy centre with a precision of 650 pc. The flare peaks in ∼50 days with an absolute magnitude of ∼ − 21 and fades in two years, roughly following L ∝ t −5/3 . It maintains a nearly constant blackbody temperature of ∼22 000 K in later stages. Its optical and UV spectra show hydrogen and helium broad emission lines with full width at half maxima of 7000–21 000 km s −1 and a He II/H α ratio of 0.3–2.3. It shows weak X-ray emission relative to UV emission, with X-ray flares lasting for < 2 − 3 weeks, during which the spectrum is soft with a power-law index of Γ = 4.4 −1.3 +1.4 . These characters are consistent with a TDE, ruling out the possibilities of a supernova or an active galactic nucleus flare. With a TDE model, we infer a peak UV luminosity of 3.3 ± 0.2 × 10 44 erg s −1 and an energy budget of 4.5 ± 0.2 × 10 51 erg. Conclusions. A TDE caused the flare that occurred in 2021. The two optical flares separated by 10.3 ± 0.3 years can be interpreted as repeating partial TDEs, double TDEs, or two independent TDEs. Although no definitive conclusion can be drawn, the partial TDEs interpretation predicts a third flare around 2033, and the independent TDEs interpretation predicts a high TDE rate of ≳10 −2 yr −1 in F01004-2237, both of which can be tested by future observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452380
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recurring tidal disruption events a decade apart in IRAS F01004-2237

Yang Lei, M. Gromadzki, Liming Dou, Xiaohui Fan et al.
13 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
4.31
article

Recurring tidal disruption events a decade apart in IRAS F01004-2237

Yang Lei, M. Gromadzki, Liming Dou, Xiaohui Fan, Subo Dong, Tom Wu, Fabao Zhang, D. A. H. Buckley, Xinwen Shu, Xiaer Zhang, S. B. Cenko, Tinggui Wang, Jiazheng Zhu, Zhu Liu, Wenjie Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Ning Jiang, Luming Sun, Yibo Wang
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Context. In theory, recurring tidal disruption events (TDEs) may occur when a close stellar binary encounters a supermassive black hole, if one star is captured and undergoes repeating partial TDEs, or if both stars are tidally disrupted (double TDEs). In addition, independent TDEs may be observed over decades in some special galaxies where the TDE rate is extremely high. Exploring the diversity of recurring TDEs and probing their natures with rich observational data helps us to understand these mechanisms. Aims. We report the discovery of a second optical flare that occurred in September 2021 in IRAS F01004-2237, where a first flare that occurred in 2010 had already been reported. We also present a detailed analysis of multi-band data. We aim to understand the nature of the flare and explore the possible causes of the recurring flares. Methods. We describe our analysis of the position of the flare, the multi-band light curves (LCs), the optical and ultraviolet (UV) spectra, and the X-ray LC and spectra. Results. The position of the flare coincides with the galaxy centre with a precision of 650 pc. The flare peaks in ∼50 days with an absolute magnitude of ∼ − 21 and fades in two years, roughly following L ∝ t −5/3 . It maintains a nearly constant blackbody temperature of ∼22 000 K in later stages. Its optical and UV spectra show hydrogen and helium broad emission lines with full width at half maxima of 7000–21 000 km s −1 and a He II/H α ratio of 0.3–2.3. It shows weak X-ray emission relative to UV emission, with X-ray flares lasting for < 2 − 3 weeks, during which the spectrum is soft with a power-law index of Γ = 4.4 −1.3 +1.4 . These characters are consistent with a TDE, ruling out the possibilities of a supernova or an active galactic nucleus flare. With a TDE model, we infer a peak UV luminosity of 3.3 ± 0.2 × 10 44 erg s −1 and an energy budget of 4.5 ± 0.2 × 10 51 erg. Conclusions. A TDE caused the flare that occurred in 2021. The two optical flares separated by 10.3 ± 0.3 years can be interpreted as repeating partial TDEs, double TDEs, or two independent TDEs. Although no definitive conclusion can be drawn, the partial TDEs interpretation predicts a third flare around 2033, and the independent TDEs interpretation predicts a high TDE rate of ≳10 −2 yr −1 in F01004-2237, both of which can be tested by future observations.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 692
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of Arizona (US), Peking University (CN), Yunnan Observatories (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE), Kavli Institute for Theoretical Sciences (CN), South African Radio Astronomy Observatory (ZA), National Astronomical Observatories (CN), Deleted Institution, Anhui Normal University (CN), University of Warsaw (PL)
National Science Foundation, California Institute of Technology, University of Leicester, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
4.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.