How Should AI Decisions Be Explained? Requirements for Explanations from the Perspective of European Law

This paper investigates the relationship between law and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). While there is much discussion about the AI Act, which was adopted by the European Parliament in March 2024, other areas of law seem underexplored. This paper focuses on European (and in part German) law, although with international concepts and regulations such as fiduciary duties, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and product safety and liability. Based on XAI-taxonomies, requirements for XAI methods are derived from each of the legal fields, resulting in the conclusion that each legal field requires different XAI properties and that the current state of the art does not fulfill these to full satisfaction, especially regarding the correctness (sometimes called fidelity) and confidence estimates of XAI methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31648
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Should AI Decisions Be Explained? Requirements for Explanations from the Perspective of European Law

Benjamin Frész, Marco F. Huber, Danilo Brajovic, Elena Dubovitskaya et al.
11 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
44.81
article

How Should AI Decisions Be Explained? Requirements for Explanations from the Perspective of European Law

Benjamin Frész, Marco F. Huber, Danilo Brajovic, Elena Dubovitskaya, Christian Horz
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between law and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). While there is much discussion about the AI Act, which was adopted by the European Parliament in March 2024, other areas of law seem underexplored. This paper focuses on European (and in part German) law, although with international concepts and regulations such as fiduciary duties, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and product safety and liability. Based on XAI-taxonomies, requirements for XAI methods are derived from each of the legal fields, resulting in the conclusion that each legal field requires different XAI properties and that the current state of the art does not fulfill these to full satisfaction, especially regarding the correctness (sometimes called fidelity) and confidence estimates of XAI methods.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 7
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (DE), Giessen School of Theology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
44.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.