Contributory Injustice, Epistemic Calcification and the Use of AI Systems in Healthcare

AI systems have long been touted as a means to transform the healthcare system and improve service user outcomes. However, these claims frequently ignore the social context that leaves service users subject to epistemic oppression. This paper introduces the term “epistemic calcification” to describe how the use of AI systems leads to our epistemological systems becoming stuck in fixed frameworks for understanding the world. Epistemic calcification leads to contributory injustice as it reduces the ability of healthcare systems to meaningfully consider alternative understandings of people’s health experiences. By analysing examples of algorithmic prognosis and diagnosis, this paper demonstrates the challenges of addressing contributory injustice in AI systems and the need for contestability to focus on more than the AI system and on the underlying epistemologies of AI systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31659
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contributory Injustice, Epistemic Calcification and the Use of AI Systems in Healthcare

Mahi Hardalupas
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

Contributory Injustice, Epistemic Calcification and the Use of AI Systems in Healthcare

Mahi Hardalupas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

AI systems have long been touted as a means to transform the healthcare system and improve service user outcomes. However, these claims frequently ignore the social context that leaves service users subject to epistemic oppression. This paper introduces the term “epistemic calcification” to describe how the use of AI systems leads to our epistemological systems becoming stuck in fixed frameworks for understanding the world. Epistemic calcification leads to contributory injustice as it reduces the ability of healthcare systems to meaningfully consider alternative understandings of people’s health experiences. By analysing examples of algorithmic prognosis and diagnosis, this paper demonstrates the challenges of addressing contributory injustice in AI systems and the need for contestability to focus on more than the AI system and on the underlying epistemologies of AI systems.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 7
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.