Face the Facts: Using Face Averaging to Visualize Gender-by-Race Bias in Facial Analysis Algorithms
We applied techniques from psychology --- typically used to visualize human bias --- to facial analysis systems, providing novel approaches for diagnosing and communicating algorithmic bias. First, we aggregated a diverse corpus of human facial images (N=1492) with self-identified gender and race. We tested four automated gender recognition (AGR) systems and found that some exhibited intersectional gender-by-race biases. Employing a technique developed by psychologists --- face averaging --- we created composite images to visualize these systems' outputs. For example, we visualized what an "average woman" looks like, according to a system's output. Second, we conducted two online experiments wherein participants judged the bias of hypothetical AGR systems. The first experiment involved participants (N=228) from a convenience sample. When depicting the same results in different formats, facial visualizations communicated bias to the same magnitude as statistics. In the second experiment with only Black participants (N=223), facial visualizations communicated bias significantly more than statistics, suggesting that face averages are meaningful for communicating algorithmic bias.
Authors
- Erin Freiburger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4894-5279)
- Kentrell Owens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2691-6274)
- Kurt Hugenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-6916)
- Tadayoshi Kohno
- Mattea Sim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-2459)
- Franziska Roesner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-4810)
- Ryan Hutchings (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0850-1171)
Institutions
- University of Washington (US)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
- Published
- 2024-10-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31707
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Face recognition and analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.25
Funders
- National Science Foundation