Habemus a Right to an Explanation: so What? – A Framework on Transparency-Explainability Functionality and Tensions in the EU AI Act

The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), finalized in February 2024, mandates comprehensive transparency and explainability requirements for AI systems to enable effective oversight and safeguard fundamental rights. However, the practical implementation of these requirements faces challenges due to tensions between the need for meaningful explanations and the potential risks to intellectual property and commercial interests of AI providers. This research proposes the Transparency-Explainability Functionality and Tensions (TEFT) framework to systematically analyze the complex interplay of legal, technical, and socio-ethical factors shaping the realization of algorithmic transparency and explainability in the EU context. Through a two-pronged approach combining a focused literature review and an in-depth examination of the AI Act's provisions, we identify key friction points and challenges in operationalizing the right to explanation. The TEFT framework maps the interests and incentives of various stakeholders, including AI providers & deployers, oversight bodies, and affected individuals, while considering their goals, expected benefits, risks, possible negative impacts, and context to algorithmic explainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31700
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
48.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Habemus a Right to an Explanation: so What? – A Framework on Transparency-Explainability Functionality and Tensions in the EU AI Act

Luca Nannini
12 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
48.89
article

Habemus a Right to an Explanation: so What? – A Framework on Transparency-Explainability Functionality and Tensions in the EU AI Act

Luca Nannini
article en
12 citations

Abstract

The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), finalized in February 2024, mandates comprehensive transparency and explainability requirements for AI systems to enable effective oversight and safeguard fundamental rights. However, the practical implementation of these requirements faces challenges due to tensions between the need for meaningful explanations and the potential risks to intellectual property and commercial interests of AI providers. This research proposes the Transparency-Explainability Functionality and Tensions (TEFT) framework to systematically analyze the complex interplay of legal, technical, and socio-ethical factors shaping the realization of algorithmic transparency and explainability in the EU context. Through a two-pronged approach combining a focused literature review and an in-depth examination of the AI Act's provisions, we identify key friction points and challenges in operationalizing the right to explanation. The TEFT framework maps the interests and incentives of various stakeholders, including AI providers & deployers, oversight bodies, and affected individuals, while considering their goals, expected benefits, risks, possible negative impacts, and context to algorithmic explainability.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 7
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
48.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.