Ontology of Belief Diversity: A Community-Based Epistemological Approach

AI applications across classification, fairness, and human interaction often implicitly require ontologies of social concepts. Constructing these well – especially when there are many relevant categories – is a controversial task but is crucial for achieving meaningful inclusivity. Here, we focus on developing a pragmatic ontology of belief systems, which isa complex and often controversial space. By iterating on our community-based design until mutual agreement is reached, we found that epistemological methods were best for categorizing the fundamental ways beliefs differ, maximally respecting our principles of inclusivity and brevity. We demonstrate our methodology’s utility and interpretability via user studies in term annotation and sentiment analysis experiments for belief fairness in language models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31761
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ontology of Belief Diversity: A Community-Based Epistemological Approach

Hao Zhang, Erin van Liemt, Tyler Fischella
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

Ontology of Belief Diversity: A Community-Based Epistemological Approach

Hao Zhang, Erin van Liemt, Tyler Fischella
article en

Abstract

AI applications across classification, fairness, and human interaction often implicitly require ontologies of social concepts. Constructing these well – especially when there are many relevant categories – is a controversial task but is crucial for achieving meaningful inclusivity. Here, we focus on developing a pragmatic ontology of belief systems, which isa complex and often controversial space. By iterating on our community-based design until mutual agreement is reached, we found that epistemological methods were best for categorizing the fundamental ways beliefs differ, maximally respecting our principles of inclusivity and brevity. We demonstrate our methodology’s utility and interpretability via user studies in term annotation and sentiment analysis experiments for belief fairness in language models

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 7
Google (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.