Effects of different straw return methods on soil properties and yield potential of maize

Long-term continual straw return can enhance soil quality and increase crop yields by perpetually altering the soil environment. However, little is known about how different straw return methods affect soil physicochemical properties, enzymatic processes, and crop yields. The study aims to determine how different straw return practices improve soil structure, nutrients, enzyme activities, and maize yields. In this experiment, a field trial was conducted in 2021-2022 in the irrigated area of the Tumochuan Plain Irrigation District to determine the effects of four different straw returns on soil structure, nutrients, enzyme activities, soil quality, and maize yields. The four types of straw return included straw incorporation with deep tillage (DPR), straw incorporation with subsoiling (SSR), no-tillage mulching straw return, and farmer's shallow rotation (CK). Our results showed that DPR and SSR enhanced water retention capacity by reducing the bulk weight of the 0-45 cm soil layer. DPR and SSR significantly increased soil organic C (12.76%), total nitrogen (25.32%), and available nutrients (i.e. AP, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N) in the 0-45 cm soil layer compared to CK, whereas there were no differences between straw-returned treatments in the 0-15 cm soil layer. Finally, maize yield was significantly increased by 13.14% and 11.41% in the second year of DPR and SSR, respectively, compared to CK. This study demonstrated that DPR and SSR are effective at enhancing the agricultural utilization of crop residues and represent feasible strategies for improving physical, chemical, and biological processes in continuous maize cropping systems, leading to increased crop productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70404-8
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Soil Management and Crop Yield
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of different straw return methods on soil properties and yield potential of maize

Qinggeer Borjigin, Shuping Hu, Ruizhi Liu, Ruiping Li et al.
29 citations
Scientific Reports
Soil Management and Crop Yield
9.68
article

Effects of different straw return methods on soil properties and yield potential of maize

Qinggeer Borjigin, Shuping Hu, Ruizhi Liu, Ruiping Li, Xiao‐Fang Yu, Julin Gao
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Long-term continual straw return can enhance soil quality and increase crop yields by perpetually altering the soil environment. However, little is known about how different straw return methods affect soil physicochemical properties, enzymatic processes, and crop yields. The study aims to determine how different straw return practices improve soil structure, nutrients, enzyme activities, and maize yields. In this experiment, a field trial was conducted in 2021-2022 in the irrigated area of the Tumochuan Plain Irrigation District to determine the effects of four different straw returns on soil structure, nutrients, enzyme activities, soil quality, and maize yields. The four types of straw return included straw incorporation with deep tillage (DPR), straw incorporation with subsoiling (SSR), no-tillage mulching straw return, and farmer's shallow rotation (CK). Our results showed that DPR and SSR enhanced water retention capacity by reducing the bulk weight of the 0-45 cm soil layer. DPR and SSR significantly increased soil organic C (12.76%), total nitrogen (25.32%), and available nutrients (i.e. AP, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N) in the 0-45 cm soil layer compared to CK, whereas there were no differences between straw-returned treatments in the 0-15 cm soil layer. Finally, maize yield was significantly increased by 13.14% and 11.41% in the second year of DPR and SSR, respectively, compared to CK. This study demonstrated that DPR and SSR are effective at enhancing the agricultural utilization of crop residues and represent feasible strategies for improving physical, chemical, and biological processes in continuous maize cropping systems, leading to increased crop productivity.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Meteorological Bureau (CN), Baotou Teachers College (CN), Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Soil Management and Crop Yield
9.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.