Exploring the intention to consume whole vs processed edible insects: Insights from traditional and non-traditional entomophagy countries

Conventional livestock production and consumption contribute to climate change, biodiversity loss, and land scarcity. Among the several alternative protein sources currently under consideration, the use of edible insects as food offers environmental and nutritional advantages. However, consumer acceptance remains a key challenge. This study measures the intention to consume insects as food in a large representative sample of five countries (3260 respondents) with traditions in entomophagy (Mexico and China) and those with no tradition (Belgium, Italy, and the United States). First, we examined the intention to consume whole and processed edible insects within each country by including gender, age, and familiarity with entomophagy. Second, we measured the impact of information on the benefits of insects as an alternative protein on the intention to eat both whole and processed insects for several categories. e.g., Bread or similar baked goods; Meat-like products (such as hamburgers); Pasta and related products; Specialty food ingredients (e.g. sports nutrition, food supplements); Protein bars; Snacks, crackers, or other similar products (e.g. biscuits). Some statistical methods such as one-way ANOVA, t -test, and Pearson have been used to test the effect of variables (e.g. age and gender) on the intention to eat insects and the other product categories, sorted by country, and considering two different groups (informed and not informed respondents). Our results suggest that the intention to eat both whole and processed insects is still low in European Union countries and the United States. On the other hand, the results suggested that Mexico and China are ahead in their willingness to eat such products compared to Western countries. Interestingly, the information did not affect the intention to eat either whole or processed insects. However, some differences exist between product categories with consumers willing to eat whole insects tending to be more likely to consume products with insects in the forms of bread, meat-like products, and pasta products. Our results can help scholars and practitioners to explore the acceptance of insects as food. • This study measures the intention to consume insects as food in five countries. • The role of information on the intention to eat both whole and processed insects. • Mexico and China have higher willingness to eat insects than Western countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101532
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the intention to consume whole vs processed edible insects: Insights from traditional and non-traditional entomophagy countries

Giovanni Sogari, Francesco Riccioli, Davide Menozzi, Simone Mancini et al.
10 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Insect Utilization and Effects
5.40
article

Exploring the intention to consume whole vs processed edible insects: Insights from traditional and non-traditional entomophagy countries

Giovanni Sogari, Francesco Riccioli, Davide Menozzi, Simone Mancini, Roberta Moruzzo, Daylan A. Tzompa‐Sosa, Joachim J. Schouteten, Jie Li, Aijun Liu
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Conventional livestock production and consumption contribute to climate change, biodiversity loss, and land scarcity. Among the several alternative protein sources currently under consideration, the use of edible insects as food offers environmental and nutritional advantages. However, consumer acceptance remains a key challenge. This study measures the intention to consume insects as food in a large representative sample of five countries (3260 respondents) with traditions in entomophagy (Mexico and China) and those with no tradition (Belgium, Italy, and the United States). First, we examined the intention to consume whole and processed edible insects within each country by including gender, age, and familiarity with entomophagy. Second, we measured the impact of information on the benefits of insects as an alternative protein on the intention to eat both whole and processed insects for several categories. e.g., Bread or similar baked goods; Meat-like products (such as hamburgers); Pasta and related products; Specialty food ingredients (e.g. sports nutrition, food supplements); Protein bars; Snacks, crackers, or other similar products (e.g. biscuits). Some statistical methods such as one-way ANOVA, t -test, and Pearson have been used to test the effect of variables (e.g. age and gender) on the intention to eat insects and the other product categories, sorted by country, and considering two different groups (informed and not informed respondents). Our results suggest that the intention to eat both whole and processed insects is still low in European Union countries and the United States. On the other hand, the results suggested that Mexico and China are ahead in their willingness to eat such products compared to Western countries. Interestingly, the information did not affect the intention to eat either whole or processed insects. However, some differences exist between product categories with consumers willing to eat whole insects tending to be more likely to consume products with insects in the forms of bread, meat-like products, and pasta products. Our results can help scholars and practitioners to explore the acceptance of insects as food. • This study measures the intention to consume insects as food in five countries. • The role of information on the intention to eat both whole and processed insects. • Mexico and China have higher willingness to eat insects than Western countries.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 18
University of Pisa (IT), Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), University of Parma (IT), Cornell University (US), Ghent University (BE)
Università di Pisa
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Insect Utilization and Effects
5.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.