Expectations and social decision making: An investigation of gain and loss ultimatum games

• This project uses the Ultimatum Game to investigate how people respond to fair and unfair divisions of gains and losses. • Expectations regarding modal divisions were manipulated. • Responders expecting fair gain offers had lower acceptance rates of unfair offers. • For the loss domain, responders expected a fair division, in spite of information about average offers. • Participants who expected unfair loss offers had the lowest acceptance rate of unfair loss offers. • Our study is the first one to directly investigate expectations in conjunction with decisional domains. Fairness plays a pivotal role in shaping the emergence and evolution of social relationships. The equitable distribution of resources holds significant importance. In addition to resource allocation, the distribution of losses frequently arises within business or personal partnerships. In this study, we used the Ultimatum Game to investigate comparatively how people respond to fair and unfair divisions of gains and losses. In addition, we aimed to expand current knowledge on how expectations regarding monetary divisions interact with the decisional domain. A total sample of 117 undergraduate students was divided into 3 experimental conditions after the expectation induction manipulation. All participants were presented with 30 gain and 30 loss allocation offers. Our results indicate that both the expectation regarding future monetary allocations and individual decisions when confronted with unfair offers were influenced by the decisional domain. Our study is the first one to directly investigate expectations in conjunction with decisional domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expectations and social decision making: An investigation of gain and loss ultimatum games

Rose Martin, Sabina Trif, Petko Kusev, Renata M. Heilman et al.
1 citations
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
0.53
article

Expectations and social decision making: An investigation of gain and loss ultimatum games

Rose Martin, Sabina Trif, Petko Kusev, Renata M. Heilman, Joseph Teal, Alexandru Ursu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• This project uses the Ultimatum Game to investigate how people respond to fair and unfair divisions of gains and losses. • Expectations regarding modal divisions were manipulated. • Responders expecting fair gain offers had lower acceptance rates of unfair offers. • For the loss domain, responders expected a fair division, in spite of information about average offers. • Participants who expected unfair loss offers had the lowest acceptance rate of unfair loss offers. • Our study is the first one to directly investigate expectations in conjunction with decisional domains. Fairness plays a pivotal role in shaping the emergence and evolution of social relationships. The equitable distribution of resources holds significant importance. In addition to resource allocation, the distribution of losses frequently arises within business or personal partnerships. In this study, we used the Ultimatum Game to investigate comparatively how people respond to fair and unfair divisions of gains and losses. In addition, we aimed to expand current knowledge on how expectations regarding monetary divisions interact with the decisional domain. A total sample of 117 undergraduate students was divided into 3 experimental conditions after the expectation induction manipulation. All participants were presented with 30 gain and 30 loss allocation offers. Our results indicate that both the expectation regarding future monetary allocations and individual decisions when confronted with unfair offers were influenced by the decisional domain. Our study is the first one to directly investigate expectations in conjunction with decisional domains.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental EconomicsVol. 114
London South Bank University (GB), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.